k-stage radar detection

Sosulin, Yu. G.; Gavrilov, K. Yu.; Wojtkiewicz, A.; Naiecz, M.

doi:10.1109/icr.1996.573782

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…at Ho), so these values are of the most interest. As it is seen from Fig.1, k-stage procedure 6; " is over twice efficient than the Wilcoxon procedure , !$I, and the efficiency is growing with decrease of FAP: pow=3,7 for P~l 0 " . The advantage of the procedure 6: " relative to the sequential Miller procedure 6, is small: poM =1,5 for P ,~1 0 -' and poM = p I M =1 for P~l o -" .…”

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…As it is seen from Fig.1, k-stage procedure 6; " is over twice efficient than the Wilcoxon procedure , !$I, and the efficiency is growing with decrease of FAP: pow=3,7 for P~l 0 " . The advantage of the procedure 6: " relative to the sequential Miller procedure 6, is small: poM =1,5 for P ,~1 0 -' and poM = p I M =1 for P~l o -" . With the growth of sample size (Fig.2) the efficiency of k-stage procedure 6;" relative io the procedure maintains (pow>3, 5), and that relative to the procedure 6, slowly increases: pOM =1,8 for nmX=32.…”

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…(4), (5), we use the efficiency coefficients (9) where N( a, ' +! ' ) is number of samples in the procedure 6;' and TI (6:") are conditional ASNs of the procedure 6 In Fig.1 the dependences p j w (PF) and pi,,,, (PJ are presented by thick and thin lines, respectively, and besides the solid lines correspond to the case i=O (hypothesis Ho) and the dashed lines correspond to the case i=l (hypothesis H I ) ; the computations were made for n,-=16 and PD=0.9. The similar legend of the curves is used in Fig.2 where the dependences piw (nmax) and pjM (nmax) are presented for P~1 0 " and PD=0.9.…”

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…it is interesting to determine an efficiency of onesample signed-rank k-stage procedure (l), (2) which will be designated 6;" versus the well-known signed-rank procedure with fixed number of samplesN, namely onesample Wilcoxon test (6) if Ln AM (n), =l,-**&im, where qnaX is the maximum size of observations and the thresholds A,&), BM(n) are given by the following equations:…”

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To estimate the efficiency of k-stage detection procedure 6;'' (l), (2) relative to the Wilcoxon procedure 6;,!' (4), (5), we use the efficiency coefficients (9) where N( a, ' +! '…”

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Nonparametric k-stage detection

Sosulin

Shlykov²

2001 CIE International Conference on Radar Proceedings (Cat No.01TH8559)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One-sample signed-rank and two-sample rank k-stage signal detection procedures are developed. An analysis of their efficiency versus one-sample signed-rank and two-sample rank procedures with fixed sample size of Wilcoxon type and also versus sequential signed-rank Miller procedure is accomplished. A stability of the considered signal detection procedures under conditions of clutter probability distribution change is investigated.

show abstract

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To estimate the efficiency of k-stage detection procedure 6;'' (l), (2) relative to the Wilcoxon procedure 6;,!' (4), (5), we use the efficiency coefficients (9) where N( a, ' +! '…”

Section: One-sample Detection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations