2002
DOI: 10.1115/1.1525252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K Variations and Anisotropy: Microstructure Effect and Numerical Predictions

Abstract: Computer experiments were performed on simulated polycrystalline material samples that possess locally anisotropic microstructures to investigate stress intensity factor (K) variations and anisotropy along fronts of microcracks of different sizes. The anisotropic K, arising from inhomogeneous stresses in broken grains, was determined for planar microcracks by using a weight function-based numerical technique. It has been found that the grain-orientation-geometry-induced local anisotropy produces large variatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that both triaxiality and strain are highest at the same location in the weld joints and this is also the location at which maximum creep damage is observed. Modelling of type IV cracking by other workers 8,16,17 has also produced similar results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that both triaxiality and strain are highest at the same location in the weld joints and this is also the location at which maximum creep damage is observed. Modelling of type IV cracking by other workers 8,16,17 has also produced similar results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, as already summarised by Li et al 17 recently, high equivalent strain and high triaxial stress in the FGHAZ influence the type IV cracking significantly. High equivalent strain in this zone facilitates the nucleation of the creep voids while the high triaxial stress, as already pointed out, assists the growth of these voids which in turn leads to cracking and final fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In many material science studies crystal structures need to be established models, which are divided into two kinds on the whole: a dynamic model and a static model. The dynamic model usually adopts Monte Carlo method while setting up histology framework, which involves solidifying and growth course of the crystalline grain; The static model, which do not consider the growth of the crystalline grain, is suitable for dealing with the relationship between size and orientation of crystalline grains [3,4]. In this, the method based on Voronoi algorithm is adopted to create a two-dimensional crystalline grain structure of the polycrystalline materials.…”
Section: Model Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the elastic anisotropy of crystals and the stress singularities arising at grain corners [10][11][12] can greatly affect the stress distribution at the grain level, further exacerbating stress singularity effects, depending on the anisotropy and orientation of the grains [12]. Grain orientation-induced local anisotropy may lead to large variations of the stress intensity factor (SIF) when the crack size is of the order of a few grain diameters [13]. Grain anisotropy in a nickel-based superalloy yielded a stepwise variation of the J-integral with the crack length, which was attributed to changes in transgranular crack growth rate [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%