2018
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kafka on gender, organization and technology: The role of ‘bureaucratic eros’ in administering change

Abstract: In this article, it is argued that Kafka's novels are satirical portraits of the workings of 'bureaucratic eros' in gendered organizations. In Kafka's tragi-comical fiction, a sexually perverse and uncreative 'bureaucratic eros'the opposite of the 'poetic eros'administers highly sexualized gender relationships in hierarchical organizations: law, bureaucratic regulation, administration and execution are expressions of the male officials' sexual desires. Given the lustful manifestations of 'bureaucratic eros', K… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One common – representative – mode of engagement has been to juxtapose Kafka and Weber in order to deepen our understanding of the concept of bureaucracy (Hodson, Martin, Lopez, & Roscigno, 2012; Jørgensen, 2012; Warner, 2007). In an aesthetic, more radically literary register, Kafka’s depiction of bureaucracy’s meaninglessness, incomprehensibility and self-referentiality has provoked explorations of organizational confusion, disorientation and perversity (Ossewaarde, 2019), of the uncanniness of organizational space (Beyes, 2019) and of the experience of organization in the digital age (Czarniawska, 2019; Keenoy & Seijo, 2010), and it has led to ‘Kafkaesque’ empirical inquiries into administrative life (McCabe 2015; Clegg, Pina e Cunha, Munro, Rego, & Oom de Sousa, 2016). The way Kafka’s thinking and writing circles around the groundless grounds of organization has been presented as reflections of organizational bootstrapping avant la lettre (Ortmann, 2019).…”
Section: From Representative To Aesthetic Encounters: Kafkamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common – representative – mode of engagement has been to juxtapose Kafka and Weber in order to deepen our understanding of the concept of bureaucracy (Hodson, Martin, Lopez, & Roscigno, 2012; Jørgensen, 2012; Warner, 2007). In an aesthetic, more radically literary register, Kafka’s depiction of bureaucracy’s meaninglessness, incomprehensibility and self-referentiality has provoked explorations of organizational confusion, disorientation and perversity (Ossewaarde, 2019), of the uncanniness of organizational space (Beyes, 2019) and of the experience of organization in the digital age (Czarniawska, 2019; Keenoy & Seijo, 2010), and it has led to ‘Kafkaesque’ empirical inquiries into administrative life (McCabe 2015; Clegg, Pina e Cunha, Munro, Rego, & Oom de Sousa, 2016). The way Kafka’s thinking and writing circles around the groundless grounds of organization has been presented as reflections of organizational bootstrapping avant la lettre (Ortmann, 2019).…”
Section: From Representative To Aesthetic Encounters: Kafkamentioning
confidence: 99%