Kajian Kritis Klarifikasi Pihak Terduga Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual di Kampus

Abstract

Sexual violence on campus is difficult to prove. On the one hand, voting is an effort to obtain justice and the struggle to create a safe space in the campus environment. On the other hand, sexual violence on campus threatens the campus reputation. Clarification of the parties involved has been found interesting. This study seeks to dismantle messages from the perpetrators or other parties regarding the violence that occurred critically. This study places the Critical Discourse Analysis method developed by Norman Fairclough as a guide for analysis. This study refers to Bourdieu's thoughts regarding symbolic power as the main academic foothold. The results of this study uncover three issues developed by the alleged perpetrators and the campus, namely the declaration of sexual violence, denial, and blaming the victim. Transparency and follow-up sexual activity in cases of violence are necessary. The realization of the solution can be done by building or maximizing ways to handle sexual handling on each campus. The handling division must be neutral, including from the power of the campus hierarchy. In addition, a grassroots movement is needed as a standing narrative for the alleged perpetrators of violence and concern for the alleged victims.