Mitigation of Ionospheric Threats to GNSS: An Appraisal of the Scientific and Technological Outputs of the TRANSMIT Project 2014
DOI: 10.5772/58769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kalman Filter Based PLL Robust Against Ionospheric Scintillation

Abstract: (2014) Kalman filter based PLL robust against ionospheric scintillation. In: Mitigation of ionospheric threats to GNSS: an appraisal of the scientific and technological outputs of the TRANSMIT Project. InTech, pp. 23-36. ISBN 978-953-51-1642-4 Access from the University of Nottingham repository:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid the complexity of the optimal Kalman gain computation (which is obtained from the prediction and estimation noise covariances, together with the system noise covariance matrices), these typically consider a constant gain KF implementation and then lose the optimality of the filter. Because the actual receiver working conditions are unknown to some extent, solutions based on adaptive KF (AKFs) have been studied in Zhang, Morton, and Miller (2010); Won, Eissfeller, Pany, and Winkel (2012); Won (2014); Susi, Aquino, Romero, Dovis, and Andreotti (2014); Susi, Andreotti, and Aquino (2014); and Xu, Morton, Jiao, and Rino (2017), which aim at sequentially adapting the filter parameters. Notice that the correct estimation of both noise covariance matrices is not possible due to identifiability issues (Vilà‐Valls, Closas, & Fernández‐Prades, 2015a), then typically only the measurement noise is adjusted.…”
Section: Scintillation Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the complexity of the optimal Kalman gain computation (which is obtained from the prediction and estimation noise covariances, together with the system noise covariance matrices), these typically consider a constant gain KF implementation and then lose the optimality of the filter. Because the actual receiver working conditions are unknown to some extent, solutions based on adaptive KF (AKFs) have been studied in Zhang, Morton, and Miller (2010); Won, Eissfeller, Pany, and Winkel (2012); Won (2014); Susi, Aquino, Romero, Dovis, and Andreotti (2014); Susi, Andreotti, and Aquino (2014); and Xu, Morton, Jiao, and Rino (2017), which aim at sequentially adapting the filter parameters. Notice that the correct estimation of both noise covariance matrices is not possible due to identifiability issues (Vilà‐Valls, Closas, & Fernández‐Prades, 2015a), then typically only the measurement noise is adjusted.…”
Section: Scintillation Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available real-time GNSS data is severely scintillated (0.6<S4<1.04(max)) and the possible ARX orders (1), (2) and (3) is shown to choose the best suitable order. It clearly explains that ARx(3) is suitable for real-time amplitude and phase scintillations so that three coefficients are chosen to transition matrix K i.e., ( 1 p ⇒ 3, 2 p ⇒ 3) (Eqn (8)). The power spectral density with respective to ARX modelling results for both CSM and real-time data sets can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase dynamics are additional phase variations that occur because of changes in the position of satellite and receiver. The available PLL cannot withstand with the effects on phase by dynamics and scintillations 8 . Prolific research taken place in improving the carrier tracking algorithm to make GNSS receiver self-sufficient to work even in stressful propagation conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An heuristic approach to adjust the Kalman gain has been proposed in [34] and a measurement noise adaptation using a C/N 0 estimator was analyzed in [35], a method which was further improved to sequentially adjust both noise statistics [36]. Recently, a ionospheric scintillation monitoring procedure was used to sequentially adjust the process noise covariance together with the C/N 0 estimation to adjust the measurement noise [37], and further improved to heuristically weight the resulting Kalman gain in [38]. Notice that all these techniques claim robustness against scintillation but none of them provides an effective scintillation mitigation procedure.…”
Section: Ionospheric Scintillation Mitigation and Gnss Carrier Tracmentioning
confidence: 99%