Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2005.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KALMANSAC: robust filtering by consensus

Abstract: We propose an algorithm to perform causal inference of the state of a dynamical model when the measurements are corrupted by outliers. While the optimal (maximumlikelihood) solution has doubly exponential complexity due to the combinatorial explosion of possible choices of inliers, we exploit the structure of the problem to design a samplingbased algorithm that has constant complexity. We derive our algorithm from the equations of the optimal filter, which makes our approximation explicit. Our work is motivate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of this, the number of random hypothesis necessary to obtain a mismatch-free subset is reduced by several orders of magnitude. Incorporating probabilistic predictions into RANSAC has been previously investigated in [15] for the case of weak priors and also in an EKF context [28]. Nevertheless, the reduction of the subset size and hence full exploitation of the strong a priori information available in the EKF is not explored in these works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of this, the number of random hypothesis necessary to obtain a mismatch-free subset is reduced by several orders of magnitude. Incorporating probabilistic predictions into RANSAC has been previously investigated in [15] for the case of weak priors and also in an EKF context [28]. Nevertheless, the reduction of the subset size and hence full exploitation of the strong a priori information available in the EKF is not explored in these works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, we found the SRD-SPKF to be more sensitive to outliers than the S-SPKF. Although RANSAC could be applied to the SRD-SPKF, as it has been for the EKF [23], we note that our S-SPKF would only help RANSAC, as it is less sensitive to outliers. It is not our contention that re-linearizing will always be problematic or less accurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rather similar approach is the KALMANSAC ( [20]), where an explicit estimation of the process related to the outliers is added. Nevertheless, in the absolute orientation problem we are not interested in an explicit estimation of the range data but in the localization (or "relocation") of the LIDAR.…”
Section: Morp-a064mentioning
confidence: 99%