2010
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732310033566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kaluza–klein Theory With Torsion Confined to the Extra Dimension

Abstract: Here we consider a variant of the 5 dimensional Kaluza-Klein theory within the framework of Einstein-Cartan formalism that includes torsion. By imposing a set of constraints on torsion and Ricci rotation coefficients, we show that the torsion components are completely expressed in terms of the metric. Moreover, the Ricci tensor in 5D corresponds exactly to what one would obtain from torsion-free general relativity on a 4D hypersurface. The contributions of the scalar and vector fields of the standard K-K theor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here torsion is not an independent degree of freedom coupled to spin, rather it is determined in terms of metric through a set of physically motivated constraints, which serve (i) to confine torsion to the extra dimension, leaving the 4D space-time torsion free, and (ii) to ensure that geodesic motions in 4D remain totally unaffected by the presence of the extra-dimension. These constraints have previously been imposed in terms of veilbeins [17,18], but here it is realized that they impose essentially the requirement that the fifth dimension is hidden at the level of geodesic motion. It turns out that the non-vanishing torsion components are functions of the 5D metric components with the 4D metric g µν obeying the so called cylindrical condition, namely, it is independent of x 5 .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here torsion is not an independent degree of freedom coupled to spin, rather it is determined in terms of metric through a set of physically motivated constraints, which serve (i) to confine torsion to the extra dimension, leaving the 4D space-time torsion free, and (ii) to ensure that geodesic motions in 4D remain totally unaffected by the presence of the extra-dimension. These constraints have previously been imposed in terms of veilbeins [17,18], but here it is realized that they impose essentially the requirement that the fifth dimension is hidden at the level of geodesic motion. It turns out that the non-vanishing torsion components are functions of the 5D metric components with the 4D metric g µν obeying the so called cylindrical condition, namely, it is independent of x 5 .…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative formulation of these constraints in terms of vielbeins is worked out in [17]. These constraints are clearly not tensorial in nature because the fifth dimension is singled out.…”
Section: Constraints On the Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved by imposing the algebraic constraintsΓ µ · ν5 =Γ µ · 55 = 0 andΓ µ · [αβ] = 0. A vierbein formulation of these constraints is elaborated in [25]. By analyzing the geodesic equations, we can note that any motion along the fifth dimension does not affect the 4D components of the geodesic equations.…”
Section: Reviewing T Hed Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not dynamically independent and it does not couple to the spin of matter, rather it is completely determined in terms of the metric to ensure that the extra dimension remains hidden. In this section, we briefly summarize the formulation of this theory, but see [8,20] for details.…”
Section: Reviewing T Hed Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%