KamLAND-experiment and soliton-like nuclear georeactor

Abstract

We give an alternative description of the new data produced in the KamLAND experiment, assuming the existence of a natural nuclear reactor on the boundary of the liquid and solid phases of the Earth's core. Analyzing the uncertainty of antineutrino spectrum of georeactor origin, we show that the theoretical (which takes into account the soliton-like nuclear georeactor with power about 20 TW) reactor antineutrino spectrum describes with good accuracy the new experimental KamLAND-data. 2-5 2 2 At the same time the parameters of mixing (m =2.5х10 eV , tan Θ =0.437) calculated within the 21 12 framework of georeactor hypothesis are substantially closer to the data of solar flux SNO-experiment then the parameters of mixing obtained in KamLAND-experiment.

Solar dynamo as host power pacemaker of the Earth global climate

“…It's strange, but it is true and it is confirmed by inverse correlation between the solar magnetic field (Figure 1) and the nuclear georeactor thermal power over the period 2002-2009 (Figure 7b). Thus, on the one hand, such a coordinated behavior of the solar magnetic field and the nuclear georeactor thermal power is an indirect confirmation of reality of the "axion mechanism-nuclear georeactor" energy chain and, on the other hand, according to the estimated power of various geophysical processes [29], such a generalized mechanism can provide the solarterrestrial correlations shown in Figure 1 effectively.…”

“…We have to note that, in spite of the fact that the experimental KamLAND-data are well described within the framework of georeactor model [16,17] (see Figure 5) and the location of soliton-like nuclear georeactors (Figure 6 [17]) is determined by triangulation of the Kam-LAND [18] and Borexino data [19], some geophysicists have doubts not only about existence of the georeactor, but in the first place about its power. In this connection we would like to pay attention to the strange restriction (W ≤ 6.2 TW) on the value of georeactor thermal power W, which, unfortunately, has been frequently met in the scientific literature recently [19][20][21][22].…”

“…As shown in Ref. [17], the account of this uncertainty within the framework of maximum likelihood function leads (in the minimization of the χ 2 -function) to considerable expansion of restriction on the nuclear georeactor heat power (∼30 TW) and, accordingly, to the new oscillation parameters (∆m 2 21 = 2.5 • 10 −5 eV 2 , tan θ 12 = 0.437) for reactor antineutrino.…”

“…However, under certain conditions, i.e. within the framework of the hypothesis of natural nuclear georeactor existence on the boundary of the liquid and solid phases of the Earth core [16,17], the axion mechanism can effectively provide these correlations…”

“…), which is a direct consequence of uncertainty of KamLAND experimental data [20]. However, it is necessary to keep firmly in mind that this restriction is true only for the concrete parameters of mixing (∆m 2 21 = 7.58•10 −5 eV 2 , tan θ 12 = 0.56) obtained within the framework of the concrete χ 2 -hypothesis of KamLAND-experiment which takes into account the existence of georeactor within the framework of nonzero hypothesis [21], but absolutely ignores such a nontrivial property of the nuclear georeactor as an uncertainty of georeactor antineutrino spectrum, which in the case of soliton-like nuclear georeactor reaches ∼100% [17]. As shown in Ref.…”