2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kano qualitative vs quantitative approaches: An assessment framework for products attributes analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We introduced three methods for measuring satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and the ARP model works independently of which of them is used. We applied the continuous Kano model for our case study as it has been widely discussed in literature [74]. Offering the results of the case study, we asked the managers about the usefulness of Kano model and its efficiency.…”
Section: Usefulness Of Kano For Measuring Feature Satisfaction and DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced three methods for measuring satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and the ARP model works independently of which of them is used. We applied the continuous Kano model for our case study as it has been widely discussed in literature [74]. Offering the results of the case study, we asked the managers about the usefulness of Kano model and its efficiency.…”
Section: Usefulness Of Kano For Measuring Feature Satisfaction and DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, previous scholars considered a linear relationship between the fulfillments of quality characteristics and customer satisfaction (Violante & Vezzetti, 2017). Along with the challenges and arguments related to this assumption, KANO (1984) proposed a two-dimensional nonlinear model for the classification of product features (Fig.…”
Section: Kano Model and Fuzzy Set Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, UX is considered a multifaceted phenomena that involves subjective feelings (change in core affect) [12], behavioural, expressive, and physiological reactions [13,14]. Today a number of different methods, such as quality function deployment (QFD) [15], semantical environment description (SMB or SD) [16], conjoint analysis [17], Kano model (Sauerwein, E., Bailom, F., Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. H., 1996), Kano [18], and Kansei engineering [19,20] exist and are used in practical applications to capture the customer's considerations and feelings of products and translate these emotional aspects into concrete product design [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%