2010
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kaplan–Meier method is inappropriate for estimating cumulative incidence of graft‐versus‐host disease in the presence of competing events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the ‘stcrreg’ command in STATA statistical software for the semi-parametric competing risk regression analysis of Fine and Gray [15] to investigate the relationship between the polymorphisms and the cumulative risk of GVHD, because this statistical tool has been considered to be the most appropriate approach for the analysis of cumulative incidence of GVHD which is significantly influenced by competing events [16]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the ‘stcrreg’ command in STATA statistical software for the semi-parametric competing risk regression analysis of Fine and Gray [15] to investigate the relationship between the polymorphisms and the cumulative risk of GVHD, because this statistical tool has been considered to be the most appropriate approach for the analysis of cumulative incidence of GVHD which is significantly influenced by competing events [16]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was estimated according to the method reported by Gray (15) considering the presence of competing events at the time of CNS relapse (16) . For this analysis, treatment failure was classified as: a) isolated CNS relapse; b) combined CNS and bone marrow relapse; c) other isolated or combined relapses; d) death while in remission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%