2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4235-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis

Abstract: Background Although Kaplan-Meier survival analysis is commonly used to estimate the cumulative incidence of revision after joint arthroplasty, it theoretically overestimates the risk of revision in the presence of competing risks (such as death). Because the magnitude of overestimation is not well documented, the potential associated impact on clinical and policy decision-making remains unknown. Questions/purposes We performed a meta-analysis to answer the following questions: (1) To what extent does the Kapla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
70
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy is more heavily influenced by diminishing strength of our Kaplan-Meier estimates at those time points given the effects of loss to follow-up and mortality in our cohort, with median follow-up of 9.8 years and only 49% of patients completing longer than 10 years of follow-up. Furthermore, some authors suggest the Kaplan-Meier method overestimates the risk of revision after TKA especially in studies with long follow-up durations [23]. By design, this form of analysis estimates the time to a distinct event that will ultimately occur for all subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy is more heavily influenced by diminishing strength of our Kaplan-Meier estimates at those time points given the effects of loss to follow-up and mortality in our cohort, with median follow-up of 9.8 years and only 49% of patients completing longer than 10 years of follow-up. Furthermore, some authors suggest the Kaplan-Meier method overestimates the risk of revision after TKA especially in studies with long follow-up durations [23]. By design, this form of analysis estimates the time to a distinct event that will ultimately occur for all subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24,25) Competing risk analysis was chosen instead of Kaplan-Meier in order to avoid a potential overestimation of infection risk. (26) The overall cumulative incidences were calculated within 15, 30, 90, and 365 days of surgery date. For the hip fracture cohort, we calculated overall 30-day incidence rates (IRs) as the number of hip fracture patients with hospital-treated infection during each calendar year (or biennial) divided by the total of risk-time during the same time period following the hip fracture admission, expressed per 1000 person-years..…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal cutoff to determine acceptable early migration in this cohort was calculated by the Youden index [2]. A competing risk model [15,21] was used to estimate longterm survival of stems with large early distal migration compared with stems with little early distal migration at 2 years with the endpoint ''aseptic stem loosening'', stems were assigned to groups of high and low early migration according to the calculated cutoff. We considered p values less than 0.05 to be significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%