2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karachay–Balkar relative clauses: Implications for a special type of genitive/nominative alternation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Popova & Sternin (2007), suggested a set of linguistic means which verbalize concept as concept nominative field. Nominative field is complex; it includes lexico-semantic and lexico-phraseological field as well as a synonym row (Gürer, 2020). Nominative field is not a structural unit in the language system, but it is an ordered entity of nominative units as direct concept nominations which form the nucleus of the field as well as nominations of separate concept cognitive signs which reveal its sense and the attitude to it, i.e./the periphery units of the nominative field (Popova & Sternin, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popova & Sternin (2007), suggested a set of linguistic means which verbalize concept as concept nominative field. Nominative field is complex; it includes lexico-semantic and lexico-phraseological field as well as a synonym row (Gürer, 2020). Nominative field is not a structural unit in the language system, but it is an ordered entity of nominative units as direct concept nominations which form the nucleus of the field as well as nominations of separate concept cognitive signs which reveal its sense and the attitude to it, i.e./the periphery units of the nominative field (Popova & Sternin, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%