2021
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2019.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kardia Mobile applicability in clinical practice: A comparison of Kardia Mobile and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram records in 100 consecutive patients of a tertiary cardiovascular care center

Abstract: Background: Mobile devices are gaining a rising number of users in all countries around the globe. Novel solutions to diagnose patients with out-of-hospital onset of arrhythmic symptoms can be easily used to record such events, but the effectiveness of these devices remain unknown. Methods: In a group of 100 consecutive patients of an academic cardiology care center (mean age 68 ± 14.2 years, males: 66%) a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and a Kardia Mobile (KM) record were registered. Both versions w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It features a very high sensitivity and specificity. Koltowski et al [46] and Lowres et al [51] found high accuracy of this device compared to the standard 12-lead ECG. Furthermore, Selder et al [54] evaluated an arrhythmia program using AliveCor and reported its high accuracy compared to the reference method, which was a team assessing the device-recorded ECGs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It features a very high sensitivity and specificity. Koltowski et al [46] and Lowres et al [51] found high accuracy of this device compared to the standard 12-lead ECG. Furthermore, Selder et al [54] evaluated an arrhythmia program using AliveCor and reported its high accuracy compared to the reference method, which was a team assessing the device-recorded ECGs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Information is limited, however, on how parameters such as QTc measured on a single‐ (or limited number) lead ECG can reliably substitute for 12‐lead ECG information 18,19 . In one study, QT was underestimated by smartphone single‐lead ECG 20 …”
Section: Monitoring Strategies During a Pandemic: Here To Staymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports have previously analyzed the accuracy of the ECG registry with this device to measure the QTc. Koltowsky et al compared ECG intervals between traditional 12lead ECG and 1-lead KardiaMobile in a cohort of 100 patients (13). In this series, measurements of noncorrected QT interval were shorter with the handheld device (393 vs 400 ms, p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…During a median follow-up of 23 [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] days, 16 (8.9%) patients died, all of them from severe acute respiratory syndrome. All-cause mortality was non-signi cantly higher among the group of patients fully monitored with conventional 12-ECG (12.9% vs 2.0% vs 0.0%, p = 0.052).…”
Section: Clinical In-hospital Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%