Kardiorespiratorische Fitness bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland

Finger, Jonas D.; Krug, Susanne; Gößwald, Antje; Härtel, Sascha; Bös, Klaus

doi:10.1007/s00103-013-1672-y

Cited by 24 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is clear evidence that, overall, compared with men, women have lower CRF levels. The difference between men and women is often estimated at around 20% [20, 126–128]. Common physiological explanations for this difference are women’s smaller body and organ size and higher body fat percentage, compared with men [100].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlates and Determinants of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults: a Systematic Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Enhanced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is now a well-established predictor of numerous adverse health outcomes. Knowledge about the pathways leading to enhanced CRF is essential for developing appropriate interventions. Hence, the aim of this review was to provide a detailed overview of the current state of research regarding individual factors associated with or influencing CRF among the general adult population. Methods We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and also conducted a search for grey literature (Google Scholar). Eligible indicators of CRF were objectively assessed measures of CRF by submaximal or maximal exercise testing measured using treadmill or cycle ergometer tests. We included quantitative observational studies of the general adult population. Using a semi-quantitative approach, we compiled summary tables aggregating the study results for each potential correlate or determinant of CRF. Results We identified 3005 studies, 78 of which met the inclusion criteria. Almost all of these studies were conducted in high-income countries. Study quality scores assessing the risk of bias in the individual studies ranged from 40 to 100%. Male sex, age (inverse), education, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, body mass index (inverse), body weight (inverse), waist circumference, body fat (inverse), resting heart rate (inverse), C-reactive protein (inverse), smoking (inverse), alcohol consumption, and multiple measures of leisure-time physical activity were independently and consistently associated with CRF. Conclusions In synthesizing the current research on the correlates and determinants of CRF among adults, this systematic review identified gaps in the current understanding of factors influencing CRF. Beyond the scope of this review, environmental and interpersonal determinants should be further investigated. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, CRD42017055456. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40798-019-0211-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlates and Determinants of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults: a Systematic Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…B. Heben und Tragen von Gegenständen) oder längerfristige Aktivitäten umfasst, die eine zu geringe Intensität aufweisen, um einen positiven Einfluss auf die kardiorespiratorische Fitness zu entfalten [33,40]. Im Einklang mit dieser Hypothese wurde im Rahmen der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS) gezeigt, dass keine SES-Unterschiede hinsichtlich der kardiorespiratorischen Fitness bei Männern bestehen [41]. Allerdings führt ein hoher Gesamtenergieverbrauch langfristig zu einem erhöhten Energiebedarf, den Personen aus sozioökonomisch benachteiligten Gruppen mit einer eher ungesunden energiereichen Nahrung zu decken scheinen [42,43] …”

Section: Sozioökonomische Merkmaleunclassified

Sozioökonomische Unterschiede in der körperlich-sportlichen Aktivität von Erwerbstätigen im mittleren Lebensalter

Hoebel

Finger

Kuntz

et al. 2015

Bundesgesundheitsbl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Maximal ergometer tests are the gold standard for the measurement of CRF [37, 38], but due to the vigorous exertion required, they carry the risk of causing adverse cardiac outcomes [39] and require the presence of a trained physician and full set-up of safety and emergency equipment [37]. Therefore, submaximal tests are used frequently in studies, especially in larger, population-based studies [40, 41], to measure CRF instead because they are safer as well as more cost-effective and time-effective, while still providing an objective and satisfactory assessment of CRF [42, 43]. …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why are some people more fit than others? Correlates and determinants of cardiorespiratory fitness in adults: protocol for a systematic review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a physical condition that is now well established as a predictor of numerous adverse health outcomes, independent of physical activity levels. In order to be able to improve CRF at the population level and to develop effective interventions and public health programmes, it is important to understand why some people are more fit than others. Therefore, the primary aim of the systematic review described in this protocol is to examine individual and interpersonal factors that are correlated with or determine CRF among adults.MethodsThe review will focus on quantitative studies that investigate any personal and interpersonal correlates and/or determinants of objectively measured CRF among the general, non-symptomatic, non-institutionalized adult population (aged 18–65 years) worldwide. The databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library will be searched to identify all relevant published journal articles, and Google Scholar and Scopus will be searched for grey literature. Studies where CRF is not an outcome variable and experimental studies where participants specifically receive a fitness intervention that increases CRF will be excluded. For each study, data extracted will include, among other variables, study characteristics, methodology for selecting participants into the study as well as the participants’ demographic characteristics, types of correlates and determinants of CRF investigated and their measurement methods, the objective measure of CRF used and its measurement method and validity, and the main reported results on the association between the correlates or determinants and CRF. In addition, observational studies will be assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias using a customized version of the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Experimental studies will be assessed using the 27-item Downs and Black “Checklist for Measuring Study Quality”. The final results will be presented as a narrative synthesis of the main findings of all included studies.DiscussionBy consolidating and synthesizing the current research on possible individual and interpersonal correlates and determinants of CRF among adults worldwide, we aim to aid future public health actions, as well as identify gaps in our full understanding of what influences CRF.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42017055456.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0497-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Kardiorespiratorische Fitness bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland

Cited by 24 publications

References 29 publications

Correlates and Determinants of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults: a Systematic Review

Correlates and Determinants of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults: a Systematic Review

Sozioökonomische Unterschiede in der körperlich-sportlichen Aktivität von Erwerbstätigen im mittleren Lebensalter

Why are some people more fit than others? Correlates and determinants of cardiorespiratory fitness in adults: protocol for a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About