Kontrastmittel in Der Kardiologie 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72352-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kardiovaskuläre Rückwirkungen verschiedener Röntgenkontrastmittel bei der Koronarangiographie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A directionally opposite change occurred in the patients with a normal baseline dP/dt, probably because of negative inotropic effect of iopromide. [16][17][18] Both sets of alterations in LV maximum dP/dt were mirrored by significant and directionally appropriate changes in EMAT. Table 4 also demonstrates a significant decrease in negative LV maximum dP/dt in patients with normal baseline LV systolic function, probably, due to the negative lusitropic effect of iopromide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A directionally opposite change occurred in the patients with a normal baseline dP/dt, probably because of negative inotropic effect of iopromide. [16][17][18] Both sets of alterations in LV maximum dP/dt were mirrored by significant and directionally appropriate changes in EMAT. Table 4 also demonstrates a significant decrease in negative LV maximum dP/dt in patients with normal baseline LV systolic function, probably, due to the negative lusitropic effect of iopromide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%