2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karst landscape evolution in the littoral area of the Bay of Biscay (north Iberian Peninsula)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COB1 flowstone in the Cobiheru Cave is coeval to the second generation of spelethems (141–112 ka) recognized in the Bay of Biscay; these speleothems are related to the fluvial deposits of the Urtiaga Cave II. COB2 flowstone possibly matches with the third generation ( c. 58 ka), which is related also to the detrital deposits of the Urtiaga Cave II (Aranburu et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…COB1 flowstone in the Cobiheru Cave is coeval to the second generation of spelethems (141–112 ka) recognized in the Bay of Biscay; these speleothems are related to the fluvial deposits of the Urtiaga Cave II. COB2 flowstone possibly matches with the third generation ( c. 58 ka), which is related also to the detrital deposits of the Urtiaga Cave II (Aranburu et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A similar fluvial sequence to the detrital deposits of the Cobiheru Cave was deposited before 124 ka in El Pindal Cave (Asturias, Figure B), where speleothem precipitation was not identified during MIS 6 (Jiménez‐Sánchez et al , , ). Endokarstic fluvial deposition sedimentation would have occurred during three periods (15–50, 60–95 and 170–245 ka) in the Bay of Biscay (Figure B), with the second period (60–95 ka) matching phase 4 of the evolution model proposed for Cobiheru Cave (Aranburu et al , ). COB1 flowstone in the Cobiheru Cave is coeval to the second generation of spelethems (141–112 ka) recognized in the Bay of Biscay; these speleothems are related to the fluvial deposits of the Urtiaga Cave II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the Cenozoic, several transgressions and regressions of the sea with amplitudes up to 120 m, occurred, some of them being related to the Pleistocene glaciations (Pedoja et al, 2014). The coast was uplifting and emerging from the sea since, at least, the PlioceneePleistocene boundary, forming several terraces at altitudes ranging from 5 to 250 m (Flor and Flor-Blanco, 2014;Aranburu et al, 2015;Domínguez-Cuesta et al, 2015). These emerged marine terraces were modified by recent faults, at least, in the western coast area ( Alvarez-Marr on et al, 2008), where siliceous bedrock predominates.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These emerged marine terraces were modified by recent faults, at least, in the western coast area ( Alvarez-Marr on et al, 2008), where siliceous bedrock predominates. In the central and eastern coast areas, where the study cave is situated, marine terraces with limestone bedrock were karstified, developing closed depressions and cave conduits Aranburu et al, 2015). …”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%