2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01484-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotype instability and anchorage-independent growth in telomerase-immortalized fibroblasts from two centenarian individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mondello et al (29) observed karyotype abnormalities (both numerical and structural) and anchorage-independent growth in soft agar of fibroblasts that were isolated from two centenarian patients and subsequently infected with hTERT by using a retroviral vector. However, no anchorage-independent growth was observed before PD 60, and no hTERT cell populations that were injected into immunodeficient mice produced tumors after 3 months, despite inoculation at PD107 (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mondello et al (29) observed karyotype abnormalities (both numerical and structural) and anchorage-independent growth in soft agar of fibroblasts that were isolated from two centenarian patients and subsequently infected with hTERT by using a retroviral vector. However, no anchorage-independent growth was observed before PD 60, and no hTERT cell populations that were injected into immunodeficient mice produced tumors after 3 months, despite inoculation at PD107 (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no anchorage-independent growth was observed before PD 60, and no hTERT cell populations that were injected into immunodeficient mice produced tumors after 3 months, despite inoculation at PD107 (29). Milyavsky et al (37) showed that a subpopulation of hTERT-immortalized fibroblasts gradually developed inactivation of p16 INK4A and associated loss of contact inhibition as well as increased susceptibility to transformation by H-Ras.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cen3tel cellular system has been previously described (11,12). Briefly, it was derived from primary cen3 fibroblasts by infection with a human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)-containing retrovirus (13). Telomerase-expressing cells were propagated in culture to population doubling (PD) ~1,000, and a gradual acquisition of the neoplastic phenotype was observed (11,12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cen3tel telomerase immortalized cell line was obtained from primary cen3 fibroblasts, derived from a centenarian individual, by infection with an hTERTcontaining retrovirus (8). Cen3tel cells were used at different steps of propagation (up to around PD 1000) reflecting different phases of transformation (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During culture propagation, immortalized cells, named cen3tel, underwent neoplastic transformation, they became able to induce tumors when subcutaneously injected into nude mice and then acquired metastatic capacity (7)(8)(9). Cen3tel cells at the early stages of tumorigenicity formed pleomorphic sarcomas in nude mice, cells at later stages induced tumors with a hemangioperycitoma-like vascular pattern, analogous to that observed in synovial sarcomas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%