1972
DOI: 10.2307/1563095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypes of Leptodactylidae Anurans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
18
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The karyotypes of the four species of leptodactylid analyzed are similar to that described by Denaro (1972), Bianchi et al (1973), Bogart (1974), Agostinho (1994), Silva et al (2000), Baldo (2002), and Amaro-Ghilardi et al (2006) who pointed out the conserva- (2000), Baldo (2002), and Amaro-Ghilardi et al (2006) who pointed out the conserva- (2006) who pointed out the conservatism of the Leptodactylus karyotypes. Despite that no significant difference was observed in morphology, the pattern of C-banding or NOR localization between the specimens from the two environments and the occurrence of chromosomal polymorphisms in different amphibian populations were related, involving especially the diploid number, NORs and constitutive heterochromatin (Ruiz et al, 1981;Silva et al, 1999Silva et al, , 2000Lourenço et al, 1998Lourenço et al, , 2003Medeiros et al, 2003;Rosa et al, 2003).…”
Section: Cytogenetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The karyotypes of the four species of leptodactylid analyzed are similar to that described by Denaro (1972), Bianchi et al (1973), Bogart (1974), Agostinho (1994), Silva et al (2000), Baldo (2002), and Amaro-Ghilardi et al (2006) who pointed out the conserva- (2000), Baldo (2002), and Amaro-Ghilardi et al (2006) who pointed out the conserva- (2006) who pointed out the conservatism of the Leptodactylus karyotypes. Despite that no significant difference was observed in morphology, the pattern of C-banding or NOR localization between the specimens from the two environments and the occurrence of chromosomal polymorphisms in different amphibian populations were related, involving especially the diploid number, NORs and constitutive heterochromatin (Ruiz et al, 1981;Silva et al, 1999Silva et al, , 2000Lourenço et al, 1998Lourenço et al, , 2003Medeiros et al, 2003;Rosa et al, 2003).…”
Section: Cytogenetic Analysissupporting
confidence: 68%
“…While both the species analyzed in the present study had been previously karyotyped, beginning in the 1970s (Denaro 1972, Bianchi et al 1973, Bogart 1974, and revised more recently (Amaro- Ghilardi et al 2006, Silva et al 2006, this is the first cytogenetic study of populations from the Caatinga, the least well protected Brazilian biome (Leal et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Approximately 40 species of Leptodactylus have been karyotyped (Zaracho and Hernando 2011), and most share very similar features, with the emphasis on metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes (Silva et al 2004, Amaro-Ghilardi et al 2006, Gazoni et al 2012. A number of cytogenetic studies have reinforced the conservative nature of the karyotypes of the representatives of this genus (Denaro 1972, Bianchi et al 1973, Bogart 1974, Silva et al 2000, Amaro-Ghilardi et al 2006, Arruda and Morielle-Versute 2008, Gazoni et al 2012. The taxonomic position of a number of species groups is, however, still controversial (Angulo et al 2003, Heyer 2005, Lavilla et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now this is the only species in the subfamily with 28 chromosomes, and a secondary constriction on pair 3. The majority of Hylodes and Crossodactylus species agree in karyotype features, with 26 chromosomes (with exception of H. nasus, 2n=24) and a very large first pair of chromosomes (with exception of C. dispar) containing a secondary constriction and frequently one more constriction in another chromosome pair (Becak 1968, Bogart 1970, 1991, Denaro 1972, De Lucca and Jim 1974. Like all hylodine there are no distinctive size group of chromosome in M. massarti.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%