1979
DOI: 10.1071/zo9790373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypic Evolution in Gehyra (Gekkonidae: Reptilia) I. The Gehyra Variegata-Punctata Complex.

Abstract: A karyotypic analysis of populations of the gekkos Gehyra variegata and G. punctata reveals three chromosome races in G. variegata (2n = 44; 2n = 40a; 2n = 40b), and three in G. punctata (2n = 44; 2n = 42; 2n = 38). The chromosome races have differentiated by a series of chromosome fusions. The ordered nature of these changes suggests that the phylogenetic relationships of the races cut across the current taxonomy, and it is argued that there is but one 2n = 44 race, occurring as a number of morphologically di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
56
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The content of our two groups mostly matches the subdivision proposed by Mitchell (1965) and King; however, two of King's australis group species, G. occidentalis and G. xenopus, fall into our variegata clade. Species contained within the initial concepts of the G. australis clade (Figure 2) were, on average, larger-bodied taxa (King, 1983;Horner, 2005) associated with the tropical, subtropical and monsoonal tropics of Australia and southern New Guinea, whereas the variegata clade comprised smaller bodied species associated with the arid and semi-arid zones (King, 1979;Moritz, 1986). Both G. occidentalis and G. xenopus are relatively large bodied (maximum SVL (Snout-vent length) 465 mm), both are confined to the monsoonal Kimberley region of Western Australia and both branch near the base of the G. variegata clade.…”
Section: Gehyra Australis Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The content of our two groups mostly matches the subdivision proposed by Mitchell (1965) and King; however, two of King's australis group species, G. occidentalis and G. xenopus, fall into our variegata clade. Species contained within the initial concepts of the G. australis clade (Figure 2) were, on average, larger-bodied taxa (King, 1983;Horner, 2005) associated with the tropical, subtropical and monsoonal tropics of Australia and southern New Guinea, whereas the variegata clade comprised smaller bodied species associated with the arid and semi-arid zones (King, 1979;Moritz, 1986). Both G. occidentalis and G. xenopus are relatively large bodied (maximum SVL (Snout-vent length) 465 mm), both are confined to the monsoonal Kimberley region of Western Australia and both branch near the base of the G. variegata clade.…”
Section: Gehyra Australis Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian Gehyra radiation has proven to be taxonomically troublesome in the past, as considerable genetic, karyotypic and allozyme variation does not manifest in easily recognizable morphological variation. Thus, many species comprise multiple morphological isolates, distinct chromosome races, allozymeoperational taxonomic units and mitochondrial clades (King, 1979(King, , 1982(King, , 1983(King, , 1984Moritz, 1984Moritz, , 1986Moritz, , 1992Sistrom et al, 2009;Sites and Moritz, 1987). As a relatively recent radiation (King, 1984), gene tree discordance in Gehyra is expected owing to ILS (Edwards, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…no mention was made of G. dubia [Macleay, 1877], indicating Bustard was unaware of this name). In the late 1970s and early 1980s, work on documenting the karyotypes of widely distributed Gehyra taxa in Australia by King and Moritz began to reveal the true confusion in the genus and resulted in many species descriptions (reviewed in King 1979Moritz 1986;Sistrom et al 2009Sistrom et al , 2013. Based on widely varying karyotypes across the region, new species were erected to accommodate several chromosomally and morphologically divergent populations, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%