1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00365385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypic orthoselection in Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we are not yet in a position to discuss the exact process of speciation in the immigrans species group and we cannot determine whether f usions or fissions were more important during their evolution, it is possible to say that in the D. nasuta subgroup, chromosomal reconstitutions occurring by f usions were the main factors in their evolutionary process, as pointed by Ranganath and Hagele (1981). If this is true, D, albomicans is the most advanced species in this subgroup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we are not yet in a position to discuss the exact process of speciation in the immigrans species group and we cannot determine whether f usions or fissions were more important during their evolution, it is possible to say that in the D. nasuta subgroup, chromosomal reconstitutions occurring by f usions were the main factors in their evolutionary process, as pointed by Ranganath and Hagele (1981). If this is true, D, albomicans is the most advanced species in this subgroup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When considering the D. nasuta subgroup, Ranganath and Hagele (1981) proposed the orthoselection theory. According to them, one metacentric chromosome was produced by one centric fusion between two primitive rods and a second centric fusion between other original elements yielded the second pair of metacentrics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Email: nbruom@gmail.com karyotype of Cytorace 1, there is no freely available X-chromosome and it always existed as a part of the X3 a chromosome. This centric fission has occurred in the metacentric X3 chromosome of D. n. albomicans, which is phylogenetically a product of three centric fusions (Ranganath & Hagele 1981). The derivative race of this centric fission event is known as the Fissioncytorace-1 ( Figure 1) with a diploid number of 2n = 8, both in males (2 a 2 n 3 n 3 n XsmY n 4 n 4 n ) and females (2 a 2 n 3 n 3 n XsmXsm4 n 4 n ), wherein the Xsm indicates the new submetacentric X-chromosome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the beginning of the pioneering work of Wilson et al, (1969), phylogeny of the nasuta subgroup has been extensively studied at various levels of organiEdited by Masatoshi Yamamoto * Corresponding author. E-mail: drosrang@sancharnet.in zations namely, morphophenotypes (Nirmala and Krishnamurthy, 1972), hybridization and hybrid sterility (Ramachandra and Ranganath, 1988), karyotypes (Ranganath and Hägele, 1981;Wakahama et al, 1983;Ranganath and Ushakumari, 1987;Rao and Ranganath, 1991), hybrid salivary chromosomes (Lambert, 1978;Rajasekarasetty et al, 1980), heterochromatin and satellite DNA (Ranganath et al, 1982;Ranganath and Ushakumari, 1987), isozymes and allozymes (Kanapi and Wheeler, 1970;Ramesh and Rajasekarasetty, 1980), glue proteins (Ramesh and Kalisch, 1989), courtship patterns (Tanuja et al, 2001), courtship song (Shao et al, 1997), mitochondrial DNA (Chang et al, 1989;Yu et al, 1999), and male accessory gland proteins (Ram and Ramesh, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%