Katrina’s Legacy: Processes for Patient Disaster Preparation Have Improved but Important Gaps Remain

Abstract

Background Ensuring continuity of care for the chronically ill, who are elderly or indigent presents unique challenges after disasters; this population has fewer financial resources, is less likely to evacuate, has limited access to recovery resources, and is significantly dependent on charitable and government-funded institutions for care. This study expands a previous investigation of the extent to which healthcare providers in coastal Mississippi and Alabama have made changes to facilitate continued care to these populations after disasters. Methods Key informants representing healthcare and social services organizations serving health disparate residents of the Mississippi and Alabama Gulf Coast were interviewed regarding disaster preparation planning for the period 2009-2012. Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed for emerging themes using Atlas.ti® software. Results Participant organizations have implemented changes to ensure continuity of care for the chronically ill in case of disasters. Changes include patient assistance with pre-disaster preparation and training; evacuation planning and assistance; support to find resources in evacuation destinations; equipping patients with prescription information, diagnoses, treatment plans, and advance medications when a disaster is imminent; multiple methods for patients to communicate with providers; and more mandated medical needs shelters. Patients whose chronic conditions were diagnosed post-Katrina are more likely to underestimate the need to prepare. Further, patients' lack of compliance tends to increase as time passes from disasters. Conclusions Although changes were implemented, results indicate these may be inadequate to completely address patient needs. Thus, additional efforts may be needed, underscoring the complexity of adequate disaster preparation among disparate populations.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of care for at-risk patients in Swiss primary care settings: A mixed-methods study

“…A systematic review into the indices for continuity of care pointed to 5 principle ways researchers have operationalized and measured continuity of care: (1) duration of provider relationships, (2) density of visits, (3) dispersion of providers, (4) sequence of providers, and (5) subjective estimates, including qualitative data, patient-rated perceptions of satisfaction and appropriateness of time between visits ( Jee and Cabana, 2006 ). Whereas much scholarship has focused on continuity of care in non-crisis settings, some researchers have pointed to the impact of extenuating circumstances on healthcare service provision not related to the crisis at hand, such as the impacts for those in war zones and those displaced in war settings ( El Saghir et al, 2018 ; Lafta and Al-Nuaimi, 2019 ), natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina ( Icenogle et al, 2016 ; Quast and Mortensen, 2015 ; Raulji et al, 2018 ), and other infectious disease outbreaks, such as Ebola. The title of the article “Women and babies are dying but not of Ebola” in BMJ Global Health speaks volumes about the impact of the epidemic of Ebola in Sierra Leone in 2014 on the increase in mortality of pregnant women and stillborn babies, due in large part to the weakened healthcare system and the reallocation of already low resources prior to the Ebola pandemic to Ebola-related measures ( Jones et al, 2016 ).…”

Disaster preparation: Survey of patients with food allergies in Kobe, Japan

“…Given that Kobe City experienced the Great Hanshin‐Awaji Earthquake 20 years ago, people tend to have forgotten this tragedy. While personal experience of a disaster may temporarily increase disaster preparation, patient lack of compliance tends to increase with time . In this survey, no correlation between the earthquake experience and stockpiling rate was noted.…”

“…While personal experience of a disaster may temporarily increase disaster preparation, 2 patient lack of compliance tends to increase with time. 3 In this survey, no correlation between the earthquake experience and stockpiling rate was noted.…”

“…Although effectively educating citizens regarding disaster preparedness is a difficult task, educating them about stockpiles led 50% of the parents to changed behavior in this study. The other 50%, however, felt the necessity to stockpile but did not do it.…”

Exploring the Measurement of Hospice Resilience

“…To ensure that quality hospice care continues to be provided during disasters, advocates of patient-centered care describe the need for preparedness, monitoring, and quality assurance (DeVries, 1983; Kamal et al, 2015). The COVID-19 pandemic, hurricane landfalls (including the notable example of the 2005 Hurricane Katrina in the U.S.), and record heat waves and wildfires occurring in Europe in 2022 are just a few examples of disasters with marked effects on the most vulnerable of health system patients, further illustrating the need for hospices to act proactively to mitigate potential harm (Blanchard & Dosa, 2009; Fadul et al, 2021; Icenogle et al, 2016; Khatri et al, 2020; Kim, 2022; Kirkpatrick & Bryan, 2007; Kluge, 2022; Roussi & Wax, 2022).…”