2017
DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1392133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kazakh power distance dimension in business discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by cultural differences in both countries. Social conservatism and importance of hierarchy in the society are high in Kazakhstan (Karibayeva & Kunanbayeva, 2018). This may motivate the employees to participate in various voluntary activities that are related to the organization, with the intent to increase the possibilities of obtaining future rewards or recognition from the members of the work setting that are in more powerful positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by cultural differences in both countries. Social conservatism and importance of hierarchy in the society are high in Kazakhstan (Karibayeva & Kunanbayeva, 2018). This may motivate the employees to participate in various voluntary activities that are related to the organization, with the intent to increase the possibilities of obtaining future rewards or recognition from the members of the work setting that are in more powerful positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent to which individuals with less power accept inequalities in control and influence, defined as a country’s power distance index (PDI), is associated with subjective well-being at a national level ( Ye et al, 2015 ; Karibayeva and Kunanbayeva, 2018 ). In close relationships, power differences between relational partners oftentimes predict commitment to a relationship, how they make decisions in various domains, and how they express dominance behaviors while interacting with each other ( Dunbar and Burgoon, 2005 ; Farrell et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%