Kazan State Medical University Survey after the Use of CyberPatient&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;TM&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; during COVID-19

Mukharyamova, Laysan; Kuznetsov, M. S.; Izmailov, A. A.; Koshpaeva, Elena; Stumborg, Samuel; Qayumi, Karim

doi:10.4236/ce.2020.1110156

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A separate survey study showed that 96% of students believed the CyberPatient platform was intuitive. In addition, over 90% of students considered CyberPatient a valuable teaching tool, and 89.9% perceived the CyberPatient platform to impact their clinical performance positively (Mukharyamova et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training

Ketev¹,

Rash²,

Sandeva³

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This research assesses the effect of a virtual patient simulation platform CyberPatient (CP) compared to a high-fidelity physical simulator SimJunior (SJ) and traditional bedside training (TBT) on knowledge retention and competencies in a health education environment. Material: A total of 143 fifthyear medical students were randomly assigned to three groups: TBT-Group (n = 55) received traditional education; CP-Group (n = 44) was trained with a virtual patient platform CyberPatient; and SJ-Group (n = 44) was trained using a high-fidelity simulator SimJunior. Educational content for all groups included competencies on pediatric asthma. Methods: Students' level of knowledge acquisition was measured with a multiple-choice question test (MCQ) administered before the application of educational methods (Assessment I), immediately after completion of pediatric asthma training (Assessment II), and knowledge retention was measured two months later the completion of training (Assessment III). At the end of the study, student satisfaction was also measured by a survey questionnaire containing 5 questions rated on a Likert scale. Results: Assessment of acquired knowledge immediately after completion of pediatric asthma training revealed a significant difference between TBT-Group and SJ-Group (p < 0.05) only. However, the knowledge retention score was significantly (p < 0.05) higher for the CP-Group (91.89 ± 17.67) and ) in comparison to TBT-Group with traditional education (82.63 ± 26.22

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training

Ketev¹,

Rash²,

Sandeva³

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Students did not indicate whether they had access to paid resources that gather not only the most interesting lectures, and videos, but also interactive simulators. The experience of Kazan Medical University in the use of the Cyberpatient platform showed that student satisfaction and motivation increase with the use of virtual simulators 12 . The results of the correlation analysis within the present study are concordant with the ndings obtained previously, con rming our assumption that the insu cient use of MOOCs and simulators has partially determined the poor VAS scores.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Medical Students in Russia Evaluate the Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Student Survey

Mukharyamova

Зиганшина

Zhidjaevskij

et al. 2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The aim of the study was to obtain feedback from medical students in Russia regarding their e-learning experience during COVID-19 Pandemic. Methods 13 040 students from 46 Medical Schools in Russia completed an original evaluation form validated by 6 experts. Criterion and construct validity were determined in a pilot study (n = 46). The study design was based on the use of Google forms. Participants used the Visual Analog Scale from 1 to 10 to assess the level of knowledge acquired. Results 95.31% of medical schools in Russia switched to e-learning during the Pandemic. 39.8% of the students stated that the time to prepare for the class has doubled. For 19.9% of them, it increased by one third, while 26.6% did not report any changes. 38,4% of the participants are satisfied with particular elements of e-learning, 27.5% like such a format, 22.9% do not like it, and 11.2% could not answer the question. The average scores for the knowledge assessment were 5.9 for the humanities, 6.1 for fundamental science, and 6.0 for clinical training. Conclusions Remote learning was described by medical undergraduates in Russia as the increase in self-instruction time and the decrease in the level of knowledge gained. Only particular components of the “new normal” can be considered for use beyond the pandemic.

show abstract

Medical students in Russia evaluate the training during the COVID-19 pandemic: a student survey

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The aim of the study was to obtain feedback from medical students in Russia regarding their e-learning experience during COVID-19 Pandemic. Methods Thirteen thousand forty students from 46 Medical Schools in Russia completed an original evaluation form validated by 6 experts. Criterion and construct validity were determined in a pilot study (n = 46). The study design was based on the use of Google Forms. Participants used the Visual Analog Scale from 1 to 10 to assess the level of knowledge acquired. Results 95.31% of medical schools in Russia switched to e-learning during the Pandemic. 39.8% of the students stated that the time to prepare for the class has doubled. For 19.9% of them, it increased by one third, while 26.6% did not report any changes. 38,4% of the participants are satisfied with particular elements of e-learning, 27.5% like such a format, 22.9% do not like it, and 11.2% could not answer the question. The average scores for the knowledge assessment were 5.9 for the humanities, 6.1 for fundamental science, and 6.0 for clinical training. Conclusions The most important findings are increased self-instruction time, insufficient knowledge gained and territorial and socio-economic inequalities within the country. Meanwhile, most students favor distance learning or its particular elements. Consequently, medical education leaders in Russia should consider the implementation of blended training in medicine taking into account specific regional factors, ensuring its effectiveness at all stages.

show abstract

Kazan State Medical University Survey after the Use of CyberPatient<sup>TM</sup> during COVID-19

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training

Comparison of Knowledge Retention after the Use of a Virtual Patient versus a High-Fidelity Physical Simulator and Traditional Training

Medical Students in Russia Evaluate the Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Student Survey

Medical students in Russia evaluate the training during the COVID-19 pandemic: a student survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About