2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KD-KLNMF: Identification of lncRNAs subcellular localization with multiple features and nonnegative matrix factorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To observe the accuracy and robustness of the model, cross-validation is considered the most efficient method, which consists of jackknife test, independent dataset test and k-fold cross-validation [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In this work, 10-fold cross-validation is used to validate the baseline dataset, and the where T P , T N , F P and F N represent the number of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative, respectively.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To observe the accuracy and robustness of the model, cross-validation is considered the most efficient method, which consists of jackknife test, independent dataset test and k-fold cross-validation [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In this work, 10-fold cross-validation is used to validate the baseline dataset, and the where T P , T N , F P and F N represent the number of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative, respectively.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that sequence descriptors introduce significant bias and irrelevant features as well as generating encoding, the use of feature selection approaches soon became a frontier in the development of robust lncRNA sub-cellular localization prediction approaches. In this regard, Zhang et al [207] developed a machine learning methodology "KD-KLNMF" for accurate determination of lncRNA sub-cellular localization. They utilized a data augmentation approach to balance the imbalance dataset.…”
Section: Long Non-coding Rna Sub-cellular Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning towards the second part of Figure 4, computational predictors including lncLocPred [209], iLoc-LncRNA [205], Locate-R [208], and KD-KLNMF [207] are evaluated on benchmark datasets annotated against four distinct sub-cellular locations such as Nucleus, Cytoplasm, Ribosome, and Exosome. Among all four approaches, the performance of two computational predictors lncLocPred [209] and KD-KLNMF [207] is additionally analyzed on the independent test set as well. For each dataset, the number of sequences against four different sub-cellular locations is depicted in the bar graph (Figure 4).…”
Section: Benchmark Sub Cellular Localization Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%