2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KEAP1-driven co-mutations in lung adenocarcinoma unresponsive to immunotherapy despite high tumor mutational burden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
122
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
10
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the TIME has been shown to have less immune-cell infiltration in STK11-mutation patients who have a worse prognosis after immunotherapy (27). A similar phenomenon was also observed in patients with KEAP1 mutations, despite a high TMB level (28). Our data shows that the D scores of BRAF, ERBB2, MET, or KRAS were very similar, suggesting that they may have similar TIMEs in some ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For example, the TIME has been shown to have less immune-cell infiltration in STK11-mutation patients who have a worse prognosis after immunotherapy (27). A similar phenomenon was also observed in patients with KEAP1 mutations, despite a high TMB level (28). Our data shows that the D scores of BRAF, ERBB2, MET, or KRAS were very similar, suggesting that they may have similar TIMEs in some ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…More importantly, some gene mutations affected the prognosis and treatment effects of cancer patients. Recent studies have shown that gene mutations were closely related to the effect of tumor immunotherapy (63)(64)(65)(66). In order to gain insight into the possible mechanism of this risk model for predicting the prognosis of patients with early stage LUSC, we studied the relationship between the risk score and the top ten genes with mutation frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional positive predictive biomarkers include CD274 (PD‐L1) gene amplification, which has shown some evidence as a predictor to PD‐L1/PD‐1 therapy response in solid tumors [5]. Importantly, potential resistance biomarkers ( STK11 and KEAP1 alterations) for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have emerged in several tumor types [6, 7]. Last, we were interested in investigating the APOBEC mutational signature in UC because of its known association with increased survival of patients with bladder cancer [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%