Keep posting and following social media profiles about physical therapy, but be aware! A cross-sectional study of social media posts on Instagram and Twitter

Wageck, Bruna; Noal, Iris S.; Guterres, Brenda D.; Adami, Samantha L.; Bordin, Daiane; Fanfa, Mauricio de Souza; Nunes, Guilherme S.

doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100484

Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

2023

DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100484

|View full text |Cite

Keep posting and following social media profiles about physical therapy, but be aware! A cross-sectional study of social media posts on Instagram and Twitter

Bruna Wageck

Iris S. Noal

Brenda D. Guterres

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Factors Influencing Physiotherapists' Use of Non‐Academic Sources for Technical Information in Brazil

Nunes,

Machado,

Schreiner

et al. 2024

Physiotherapy Res Intl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and PurposeThe integration of evidence‐based practice (EBP) into clinical decision‐making is crucial for ensuring optimal patient care. However, there are various factors influencing the utilization of academic sources among physiotherapists, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of these dynamics. The present study aimed to investigate the association between personal factors (age, time since graduation, number of patients, and education level), barriers to EBP implementation and perceptions about EBP, and physiotherapists' preference for using non‐academic sources when seeking technical information about physiotherapy.MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional study involving 610 physiotherapists. Participants completed an online questionnaire covering demographic characteristics, sources of information, barriers to EBP implementation, and perceptions regarding the importance of scientific information in clinical practice. Logistic regression was used to investigate the factors associated with the preference for non‐academic sources of information.ResultsNearly a quarter of the sample exhibited a preference for non‐academic sources, with age over 34 years, perceived lack of abilities to apply scientific findings, and understanding issues related to EBP being significant associated with the preference of this types of sources of information. Physiotherapists with these characteristics were twice as likely to prefer non‐academic sources when compared to physiotherapists who do not have these characteristics.DiscussionThese findings underscore the importance of enhancing professional competencies in EBP and fostering confidence in utilizing academic sources. While efforts have been made to incorporate EBP promotion in academic curricula, further initiatives are needed to bridge the gap between established knowledge and the competencies required for daily practice. Future studies should continue to explore the role of age in EBP applicability and the adoption of scientific knowledge, aiming to inform targeted interventions and educational programs tailored to the evolving needs of physiotherapy professionals.

show abstract

Factors Influencing Physiotherapists' Use of Non‐Academic Sources for Technical Information in Brazil

Nunes,

Machado,

Schreiner

et al. 2024

Physiotherapy Res Intl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

An e-learning program improves low back pain beliefs of physiotherapists: a randomised trial

Magalhães,

McAuley,

Maher

et al. 2024

Journal of Physiotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taking a Closer Look: “Evaluating Online Video Content for Rehabilitation after Distal Radius Fracture”

Laggner,

Huber,

Hasenoehrl

et al. 2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Fractures of the distal radius are among the most common bone injuries, and their frequency is constantly increasing, leading to an elevated need for subsequent rehabilitation. This growing need has led to the emergence of online content aimed at providing guidance on rehabilitation. Nonetheless, unreviewed online content raises concerns about its reliability; therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability, and comprehensiveness of online videos concerning rehabilitation following a distal radius fracture. Methods: A total of 240 YouTube videos were screened, identifying 33 videos that met the inclusion criteria. These selected videos were evaluated by five independent experts from various professional groups, using the Global Quality Scale, the DISCERN reliability tool, and the JAMA Benchmark Score, as well as a structured set of questions to assess their comprehensiveness and coverage of pertinent aspects. Results: The observers’ assessment of the Global Quality Scale exhibited a broad spectrum of viewpoints, indicating considerable variability in evaluations. In most cases, therapy aligned well with the diagnosed condition, and most raters deemed the indication and instruction in the videos acceptable. A proportion of 87% of the videos was deemed suitable for home training by at least three raters. However, a concerning trend emerged, as potential risks and pitfalls were scarcely addressed. Conclusions: The moderate overall quality of the videos and the divergence in expert opinions highlight the need for a regulatory authority to ensure adherence to guidelines and maintain high-quality content. Additionally, our results raise concerns about the applicability of established assessment tools in this context.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Keep posting and following social media profiles about physical therapy, but be aware! A cross-sectional study of social media posts on Instagram and Twitter

Cited by 3 publications

References 31 publications

Factors Influencing Physiotherapists' Use of Non‐Academic Sources for Technical Information in Brazil

Factors Influencing Physiotherapists' Use of Non‐Academic Sources for Technical Information in Brazil

An e-learning program improves low back pain beliefs of physiotherapists: a randomised trial

Taking a Closer Look: “Evaluating Online Video Content for Rehabilitation after Distal Radius Fracture”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About