Age at sexual maturity (AgeSM) is one of the most serious demographic data gaps for sea turtle populations. Better estimates of AgeSM and associated variance would improve evaluation of population dynamics and responses of populations to disturbances and conservation measures. A population of Kemp's ridleys Lepidochelys kempii was raised in captivity under the same conditions from hatchlings to several years after maturity. Data collected from 14 female Kemp's ridleys at Cayman Turtle Farm over a 16 yr period allowed us to determine mean and variance in age, length, mass, and body condition at maturity, average pre-maturity growth rates, and post-maturity growth rates, as well as interactions among these parameters. Age, length, and mass at maturity exhibited considerable variance, with ranges of 5 to 12 yr, 47.0 to 61.0 cm, and 20.0 to 36.8 kg, respectively. Pre-maturity length growth rate is the best single predictor of AgeSM, accounting for 87% of the variation in AgeSM. Pre-maturity mass growth rate is the best single predictor of size at maturity, accounting for 51 and 65% of variation in length at maturity and mass at maturity, respectively. Although estimates of age and size at maturity from captive Kemp's ridleys cannot be applied to wild populations because of the effect of nutrition, the amount of variation around age and size at maturity in Kemp's ridleys from Cayman Turtle Farm is a good first approximation of inherent (or genetic) variation in these parameters for wild Kemp's ridleys. Population models for Kemp's ridleys that now employ a knife-edge estimate of AgeSM would be improved by incorporating a maturity schedule that reflects the variation in AgeSM.KEY WORDS: Age at sexual maturity · Size at sexual maturity · Indeterminate growth · Lepidochelys kempii · Sea turtle
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherEndang Species Res 25: 57-67, 2014 This variation is primarily a result of variation in LengthSM and not of growth after sexual maturity, because growth rates are largely negligible after maturity (Carr & Goodman 1970, Bjorndal et al. 1983, 2013a, Broderick et al. 2003, Price et al. 2004. Whether the variation in LengthSM is a result of inherent (or genetic) variation or environmental factors is not known. Whatever the cause, selection of an appropriate population-wide LengthSM for estimating AgeSM is problematic. Several measures have been used; minimum size and mean size of nesting females are the most common.A few records of AgeSM in sea turtles have resulted from marking hatchlings so they can be recognized at maturity or by tagging head-started turtles -turtles that have been reared in captivity usually for a year before release (Bell et al. 2005, Shaver & Wibbels 2007, Limpus 2009). Individual records of age at sexual maturity are very valuable and are not known for most populations. However, as these rare estimates trickle in, the extent to which they can be used to represent population estimates depends upon the amount of variation i...