Kenya

Abstract

The future of the PRSP in Kenya is currently uncertain. Until the recent elections, there were considerable and well–founded doubts about the extent of high–level political commitment to economic and political reform, including the PRSP. Nevertheless, this article argues that the PRSP process was a highly positive experience for Kenya in a number of respects. A relatively thorough consultation exercise around the drafting of the document widened and deepened constituencies for pro–poor policy change between and within some parts of government and civil society. Synergies between the PRSP, budget reforms and a ‘mainstreaming’ approach to aid delivery were also revealed, but too briefly to reconcile differences among donors about how to support poverty reduction when the political context is unpromising.

Patterns of difference and practical theory: researching the new poverty strategy processes in Africa

“…On the other hand, the PRSP consultations in Kenya under Moi are credited with having created new alliances and visions of a more reform-oriented future (Hanmer et al, 2003). It may not be too much to suggest that the process contributed in some way to the outcome of the elections in December 2002, which brought to an end nearly four decades of KANU rule.…”

Do PRSPs empower poor countries and disempower the World Bank, or is it the other way round?

“…For Kenya seeHanmer et al (2003); Mali seeDante et al (2003); Malawi seeJenkings and Tsoka (2003).10 It must be acknowledged however that effectiveness of parliamentarians in articulating local priorities depends on the quality and general importance of parliamentary institutions in countries. In some, they do not exist (e.g., Rwanda and Uganda), while in others they are sub-ordinate to the executive or to existing patronage systems (e.g.,Ghana and Kenya).…”