2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keratoconus-integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal astigmatism, and corneal biomechanics

Abstract: The visual limitation in keratoconus could be explained by different alterations that occur in these corneas and allowed development of a new grading system for this condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
128
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
128
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Grade I included patients with spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (decimal notation) of 0.90 or better; grade II, patients with CDVA equal to or better than 0.60 and worse than 0.90; grade III, patients with CDVA equal to or better than 0.40 and worse than 0.60; grade IV, patients with CDVA equal to or better than 0.20 and worse than 0.40; and grade plus, patients with CDVA worse than 0.20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 Grade I included patients with spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (decimal notation) of 0.90 or better; grade II, patients with CDVA equal to or better than 0.60 and worse than 0.90; grade III, patients with CDVA equal to or better than 0.40 and worse than 0.60; grade IV, patients with CDVA equal to or better than 0.20 and worse than 0.40; and grade plus, patients with CDVA worse than 0.20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Nevertheless, most of these grading systems have been developed taking into account the topographic morphology of the disease, the corneal keratometry readings, and corneal aberrometry, without considering other clinical data that are closely related to the visual disability caused by keratoconus. Thus, the success or failure of this surgical technique is analyzed in this study, using a keratoconus classification based on the functional performance of the patient's visual system, 15 such as visual acuity, rather than just the geometric assessment of the cornea, which is unpredictable because of response of keratoconic eyes. [19][20][21] Most of the published studies analyzing the effectiveness of ICRS implantation for the treatment of keratoconus agree that there is a significant flattening of the central cornea after the procedure.…”
Section: In This Study We Evaluated the Outcomes Of Icrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6]17,67,68 Higher amounts of vertical coma and larger values of coma-like root mean square (RMS) have been reported in patients with keratoconus or keratoconus suspect. [2][3][4][5][6]17,67 In 2006, the first keratoconus severity grading system that used the magnitude of anterior corneal coma-like aberrations as the main classifying criterion was developed (Table 3). 4 In 23 eyes with keratoconus, 10 eyes with subclinical keratoconus (keratoconus suspect by definition), and 127 controls, B€ uhren et al 17 evaluated the keratoconus detection ability of anterior corneal Figure 3.…”
Section: Corneal Aberrometric Analysis In Keratoconusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Significant differences in central and minimum corneal thickness have been shown between subclinical, early, moderate, and advanced keratoconus, 67,74 which is useful to characterize the severity of keratoconus. The advances in imaging technology allow the clinician to obtain pachymetric maps providing point-by-point information of the entire cornea ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Pachymetric Analysis In Keratoconusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation