2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernels with prescribed surface tension & mobility for threshold dynamics schemes

Abstract: We show how to construct a convolution kernel that has a desired anisotropic surface tension and desired anisotropic mobility to be used in threshold dynamics schemes for simulating weighted motion by mean curvature of interfaces, including networks of them, in both two and three dimensions. Moreover, we discuss necessary and sufficient conditions for the positivity of the kernel which, in the case of two-phase flow, ensures that the resulting scheme respects a comparison principle and implies convergence to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as pointed out later in [5], these kernels do not correctly separate the effect of anisotropic energy and mobility, and thus are not applicable to multi-phase evolution such as the one considered in this paper. This can be observed from equations ( 7)- (8), where the effect of surface energy and mobility are inseparably combined in the normal velocity but the contact angle condition depends solely on the surface energy. For this reason, we will review here only kernels developed after this seminal work.…”
Section: Anisotropic Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as pointed out later in [5], these kernels do not correctly separate the effect of anisotropic energy and mobility, and thus are not applicable to multi-phase evolution such as the one considered in this paper. This can be observed from equations ( 7)- (8), where the effect of surface energy and mobility are inseparably combined in the normal velocity but the contact angle condition depends solely on the surface energy. For this reason, we will review here only kernels developed after this seminal work.…”
Section: Anisotropic Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Notice that the sign of γ + γ is again important here, since when γ (θ) + γ(θ) is negative for some angles θ, equation ( 7) becomes backwards parabolic and thus ill-posed. When topology changes occur, such as merging and splitting of particles, equation ( 7) still holds for smooth parts of Γ away from singularities but it is not anymore possible to describe the evolution fully using simple formulas such as (7)- (8). For smooth weak anisotropies, one can give a precise mathematical definition in terms of functions of bounded variation in a similar manner to Definition 1.1 of multiphase mean curvature flow in [12].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But we are not aware of any work that addresses convergence of schemes (in a parametric setting) for evolving networks with triple junctions subject to (1.1) and (1.2). For completeness, let us mention that there are also interface capturing approaches that avoid the need P. Pozzi & B. Stinner to look after the mesh quality [7,23,28,5,17]. Such approaches comprise phase field models and level set methods, for overviews we refer to [11,4,13,27].…”
Section: P Pozzi and B Stinnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth recalling that using different (namely, in this case, non-radially symmetric) kernels in threshold dynamics comes up in its extensions to anisotropic curvature flows [3,5,6,22]. In particular, barrier type theorems [5,6] show that any threshold dynamics scheme that is at all consistent (never mind second order) with certain anisotropic curvature flows in three dimensions cannot possibly be monotone.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%