2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ketamine as a novel treatment for major depressive disorder and bipolar depression: a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (number needed to treat). A separate meta-analysis by Xu et al [41] also reported large effects favoring ketamine for short-term positive response (pooled response rate 50 vs. 13%, RR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.4 at 24 hrs; pooled response rate 31 vs. 7%, RR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-7.1 at 7 days), and remission (pooled remission rate 28 vs. 3%, RR 5.2, 95% CI: 2.1-12.9 at 24 hrs; pooled remission rates 24 vs. 6%, RR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.7 at 7 days) [42] Total (n = [43] Total (n = Xu et al 2015 [41] Total (n = Lee et al 2015 [44] Total (n = Romeo et al 2015 [45] Total (n = Coyle and Laws [46] Total (n = [47] Total (n = Fond et al 2014 [48] Total (n = Caddy et al 2014 [49] Total (n = The study sample in one reviewed study consisted of depressed patients presenting acutely to an emergency room with suicidal ideation.…”
Section: Review Of the Evidence Rapid But Variable And Short-lived Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 (number needed to treat). A separate meta-analysis by Xu et al [41] also reported large effects favoring ketamine for short-term positive response (pooled response rate 50 vs. 13%, RR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.4 at 24 hrs; pooled response rate 31 vs. 7%, RR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-7.1 at 7 days), and remission (pooled remission rate 28 vs. 3%, RR 5.2, 95% CI: 2.1-12.9 at 24 hrs; pooled remission rates 24 vs. 6%, RR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.7 at 7 days) [42] Total (n = [43] Total (n = Xu et al 2015 [41] Total (n = Lee et al 2015 [44] Total (n = Romeo et al 2015 [45] Total (n = Coyle and Laws [46] Total (n = [47] Total (n = Fond et al 2014 [48] Total (n = Caddy et al 2014 [49] Total (n = The study sample in one reviewed study consisted of depressed patients presenting acutely to an emergency room with suicidal ideation.…”
Section: Review Of the Evidence Rapid But Variable And Short-lived Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly, the effect sizes for reduction of depressive symptoms were numerically greater at 24 hrs for patients with MDD than those with BP in some [43,46] but not all reports. [44,45,48] McGirr et al [43] reported a a Data for stratified analyses of the association between ketamine treatment and transient remission in persons with MDD were provided in only one study. [51] b No evidence of heterogeneity regarding either response or remission as discrete endpoints between MDD and BP subsamples at 24 hrs, 3 days, or 7 days.…”
Section: Short-term Antidepressive Response In Mdd Versus Bp Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of one meta-analysis added to the existing evidence that support ketamine as a novel treatment option for depression, stating that ketamine has been shown to have a high response rate and rapid effect [87] . Several independent pilot studies demonstrate that after a single intravenous infusion of sub-anesthetic dosages of ketamine, its anti-depressant effects have an onset within hours and are sustained for an average of 4-7 d [88,89] .…”
Section: Chronic Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infine, nessuno dei 12 trial è stato condotto in Asia, Africa o Sud America, impedendo di generalizzare i risultati in riferimento alle popolazioni non caucasiche. Le meta-analisi dimostrano un significativo effetto di elevazione del tono dell'umore poco dopo l'infusione di ketamina (Coyle 2015;Lee 2015). Questo dato non sorprende, dal momento che tutti i trial hanno mostrato risultati positivi e la meta-analisi di Lee et al (2015) non ha utilizzato il test della regressione di Egger e non ha indicato il valore di p nell'analisi del bias di pubblicazione.…”
Section: Box 1 Raccomandazioni Dalla Canadianunclassified