Key concepts for dietetic curriculum: An observational study of Australian dietitians' perceptions

Abstract

Aim A concept‐based approach to dietetic curriculum design has been proposed to prevent content overload and promote critical thinking. Fifty‐six concepts were identified in a previous study. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the dietetic profession views these concepts as representative of current practice and key for nutrition and dietetics education, and identify any new or emerging concepts. Methods Accredited Practising Dietitians (APDs) were invited to participate in a self‐administered online survey that included scale responses on the relevance of the 56 concepts and open‐ended suggestions of additional concepts. Respondent characteristics were also collected. Results Ninety‐eight APDs completed the survey. Greater than 65% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed that all 56 concepts were relevant. There was less agreement on the concepts of acid‐base balance; leadership; management; physical activity, exercise and health; quality assurance and improvement; risk; safety; stakeholder; standards; sustainability; systems and technology and health informatics. Respondents working in regional, rural and remote areas were less likely to agree that leadership was a key concept (χ2 = 4.45, P = .035). Respondents working in teaching and education were more likely to agree that sustainability was a key concept (χ2 = 7.02, P = .008). No new concepts were identified. Conclusions The existing 56 concepts were considered key for nutrition and dietetics education. Although the respondents to this survey view these concepts as relevant to current practice, this may not represent the entire profession. It is yet to be determined if the concepts will meet future priorities for the dietetic workforce.

A qualitative exploration of the future of nutrition and dietetics in Australia and New Zealand: Implications for the workforce

“…5 It is time to define a unified nutrition and dietetics profession, which works together to develop as food aficionados, diet optimisers, knowledge translators, equity champions, systems navigators and food systems activists, change makers, activists and disruptors. Education providers may benefit from considering concept-based approaches 35 as they consider transformation of curricula to meet these needs.…”

Is there enough behaviour change science in nutrition and dietetics curricula in Australia and New Zealand? A descriptive study

“…Behaviour change science was viewed as fundamental to dietetics with some participants reporting they wanted to add behaviour change science content but felt their curriculum was already overloaded. The use of concept‐based approaches, which are “mental constructs of one or two‐word nouns, or short phrases”, 26 (p2) would allow behaviour change science content to be added without overloading curricula. Some participants expressed a lack of confidence in teaching behaviour change science.…”

Concept‐based curricula: Alignment with the 2021 National Competency Standards for Dietitians in Australia

“…2 In 2020, the present authors reported on Australian dietitians' views of 56 core concepts required for the practice of nutrition and dietetics and found that greater than 65% of respondents agreed that these concepts were relevant for education and current practice. 3 As concepts are mental constructs that are timeless, universal and abstract, and have examples that share common attributes, 4 it could be surmised that these concepts would not significantly change over time. What does change, however, are the exemplars that demonstrate how the concept would apply in dietetics which may change depending on changing health priorities or workforce needs.…”