2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
111
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
111
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This area is within a larger transnational initiative covering protected areas from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe), in which previous studies on connectivity and the barrier effect of roads for forest mammals have focused (Gurrutxaga et al 2011, Jongman et al 2011). The region is 49,472 km 2 in extent and contains the whole known range of the native populations of the brown bear in Spain, its peripheral areas and the belt area between the two subpopulations.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This area is within a larger transnational initiative covering protected areas from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe), in which previous studies on connectivity and the barrier effect of roads for forest mammals have focused (Gurrutxaga et al 2011, Jongman et al 2011). The region is 49,472 km 2 in extent and contains the whole known range of the native populations of the brown bear in Spain, its peripheral areas and the belt area between the two subpopulations.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct dispersal probabilities p ij between habitat patches were computed by a negative exponential function of interpatch distance, which has been used in many published studies (Bunn et al 2000, Urban and Keitt 2001, Gurrutxaga et al 2011). The interpatch distance was calculated as the Euclidean and effective distance between all woodland and forest patches in the study area.…”
Section: Landscape Connectivity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addi-. In addition, increasing awareness about the need to account for the capability of species to traverse different types of land covers in landscape connectivity assessment has led to the promotion of related analytical methodologies such as least-cost path modeling (Adriaensen et al 2003, Rayfield et al 2010, Gurrutxaga et al 2011. Without excluding some level of uncertainty in matrix permeability modeling (McRae 2006, Rayfield et al 2010, these methodological advances, com-, these methodological advances, combined with more functional analytical approaches, provide an opportunity to incorporate less biased criteria based on conless biased criteria based on connectivity assessment in ecological network deployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC is defined as the probability that two points randomly placed within the landscape fall into habitat areas that are reachable from each other (interconnected), given a set of n habitat patches and the links among them (Saura and Pascual-Hortal, 2007). The probability of direct dispersal (p ij ) between each pair of patches (required for the computation of the PC metric) can be estimated using a negative exponential function of the interpatch edge-to-edge Euclidean distance (Urban and Keitt, 2001;Pascual-Hortal and Saura, 2008) or of the effective distance (minimum cost) between patches (Rayfield et al, 2010;Gurrutxaga et al, 2011). The prioritisation and ranking of landscape elements by their contribution to overall connectivity can be calculated from the percentage of variation in PC (dPC) caused by the removal of each individual element (patch or link) from the landscape.…”
Section: Evaluating the Importance Of Connecting Elements Through Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The habitat availability metrics have been applied in many studies (Neel, 2008;Pascual-Hortal and Saura, 2008;García-Feced et al, 2011;Pereira et al, 2011;Awade et al, 2012) (see a full list in http://www.conefor.org/ applications.html). More recently, the research attention has been focused on the connector fraction, both in network analytical (Bodin and Saura, 2010;Baranyi et al, 2011) and ecological application studies (Gurrutxaga et al, 2011;Saura et al, 2011;Rubio and Saura, 2012). This is because, for the reasons outlined above, this fraction is directly usable for a solid and operational design of networks of connecting elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%