2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b20023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Factors Controlling the Large Second Harmonic Generation in Nonlinear Optical Materials

Abstract: The second harmonic generation (SHG) responses of nonisostructural nonlinear optical (NLO) compounds, β

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kleinman symmetry was not assumed throughout this work, because it is not rigorously correct in some cases. [22][23][24]38 The calculated results are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Shg Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Kleinman symmetry was not assumed throughout this work, because it is not rigorously correct in some cases. [22][23][24]38 The calculated results are given in Table 2.…”
Section: Shg Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results provide a clear evidence that the presence of a static polarization is not essential for the SHG response. The result that d eff of P-KDP is greater than that of F-KDP can be simply understood by means of the quasi-linear relation 23,24 between d av and V/E g , where d av is the calculated average SHG coefficient or the effective SHG response d eff , V is the volume of the primitive unit cell, and E g is the experimental band gap. The calculated values of V/E g are 28.09, 25.4 A 3 eV À1 for P-KDP and F-KDP, which show the same order as their SHG responses ( Table 2).…”
Section: Shg Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations