2014
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2014.880515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key factors influencing the potential of catch crops for methane production

Abstract: Catch crops are grown in crop rotation primarily for soil stabilization. The excess biomass of catch crops was investigated for its potential as feedstock for biogas production. Ten variables affecting catch crop growth and methane potential were evaluated. Field trials and methane potential were studied for 14 different catch crops species, with 19 samples harvested in 2010 and 36 harvested in 2011. Principal component analysis was applied to the data to identify the variables characterizing the potential for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of tall fescue and straw (T2) achieved the highest methane yield of 223 m 3 t À1 on VS basis, b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 7 9 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 e1 1 representing a 51% increase if compared to straw alone (C). Specific methane yields of the catch crop and straw blends were, on the other hand, up to 2.9 times lower than those obtained for the specific catch crops in previous studies [3]. This is due to the high proportion of straw in the mixtures, which is also reflected in the similar composition of the mixture of perennial ryegrass and wheat straw (2B) compared to wheat straw alone (2D, 2E, 2F) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The combination of tall fescue and straw (T2) achieved the highest methane yield of 223 m 3 t À1 on VS basis, b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 7 9 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 e1 1 representing a 51% increase if compared to straw alone (C). Specific methane yields of the catch crop and straw blends were, on the other hand, up to 2.9 times lower than those obtained for the specific catch crops in previous studies [3]. This is due to the high proportion of straw in the mixtures, which is also reflected in the similar composition of the mixture of perennial ryegrass and wheat straw (2B) compared to wheat straw alone (2D, 2E, 2F) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These production costs were estimated after different scenarios both for pure catch crops (Fig. 1), based on the data reported by Molinuevo-Salces et al [3], and blends of catch crop and wheat straw (Fig. 2), based on the data from the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations