2012
DOI: 10.1075/la.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar

Abstract: In light of recent generative minimalism, and comparative parametric theory of language variation, the book investigates key features and parameters of Arabic grammar. Part I addresses morpho-syntactic and semantic interfaces in temporality, aspectuality, and actionality, including the Past/Perfect/Perfective ambiguity akin to the very synthetic temporal morphology, collocating time adverb construal, and interpretability of verbal Number as pluractional. Part II is dedicated to nominal architecture, the behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This in turn predicts that bare plurals in Arabic cannot occur in generic contexts, with or without ʔakθar. As Fassi Fehri (2012) shows, this is correct. Like French, Italian and Spanish as described by Chierchia, Longobardi (1994) and others, Arabic generic plurals are obligatorily accompanied by the definite article.…”
Section: Quantity Superlative + Indefinite Dependentmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This in turn predicts that bare plurals in Arabic cannot occur in generic contexts, with or without ʔakθar. As Fassi Fehri (2012) shows, this is correct. Like French, Italian and Spanish as described by Chierchia, Longobardi (1994) and others, Arabic generic plurals are obligatorily accompanied by the definite article.…”
Section: Quantity Superlative + Indefinite Dependentmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In Arabic, APs in Arabic are dominated by (at least) two functional projections: a projection of AGR for [NUM] and [GENDER] specifications, and DP for (in)definiteness marking (see Fassi Fehri 1993, 1999, 2012, Kremers 2003. No morphological change occurs if the NOM affixation takes place in the ʻhighestʼ DP because both the adjectival and nominal articles are identical in form.…”
Section: Layers Of Nominalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS is defined as a construct that normally consists of two nouns or an adjective and a noun where the first element can be nominative, accusative or genitive based on the function of the whole construct in the sentence, whereas the second element is always genitive . Another important characteristic of CSs is that the first element obligatorily lacks a definite article, whereas the second can be definite or indefinite (see Fassi Fehri :156). Note that the definiteness of the second element spreads to the first element in CSs, producing a definite construction as a whole (see Fassi Fehri :172), as in (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important characteristic of CSs is that the first element obligatorily lacks a definite article, whereas the second can be definite or indefinite (see Fassi Fehri :156). Note that the definiteness of the second element spreads to the first element in CSs, producing a definite construction as a whole (see Fassi Fehri :172), as in (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%