Key indicators for monitoring of audiovisual quality

Leszczuk, Mikołaj; Hanusiak, Mateusz; Blanco, Ignacio; Dziech, Andrzej; Derkacz, Jan; Wyckens, Emmanuel; Borer, Silvio

doi:10.1109/siu.2014.6830724

Cited by 15 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the models in ITU-T recommendations were validated on video databases that used one of the following hypotheses: frame freezes lasting up to 2 seconds; no degradation at the beginning or at the end of the video sequence; no skipped frames; clean video reference (no spatial or temporal distortions); minimum delay supported between video reference and video (sometimes with constant delay); and up or down-scaling operations not always taken into account [17].…”

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other KPIs mentioned in MOAVI are usually not taken into account (exposure time distortion, noise, block loss, freezing, slicing, etc.) in predicting MOS [17].…”

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The history of the ITU-T recommendations for video quality metrics is shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows a synthesis of the set of metrics that are based on video signals [17]. As can be noticed from both tables, there is a lack of developments for the NR approach.…”

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a related research, Gustafsson et al [4] addressed the problem of measuring multimedia quality in mobile networks with an objective parametric model [17]. Closely related work are ongoing standardization activities at ITU-T SG12 on models for multimedia and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) based on bit-stream information.…”

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…SG12 is currently working on models for IPTV. Q.14/12 is responsible for these projects, provisionally known as P.NAMS (non-intrusive parametric model for assessment of performance of multimedia streaming) and P.NBAMS (non-intrusive bit-stream model for assessment of performance of multimedia streaming) [17]. P.NAMS uses packet-header information (e.g., from IP through MPEG2-TS), while P.NBAMS also uses payload information (i.e., coded bit-stream) [23].…”

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Recent developments in visual quality monitoring by key performance indicators

Leszczuk

Hanusiak

Farias

et al. 2014

Multimed Tools Appl

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In addition to traditional Quality of Service (QoS), Quality of Experience (QoE) poses a real challenge for Internet service providers, audio-visual services, broadcasters and new Over-The-Top (OTT) services. Therefore, objective audio-visual metrics are frequently being dedicated in order to monitor, troubleshoot, investigate and set benchmarks of content applications working in real-time or off-line. The concept proposed here, Monitoring of Audio Visual Quality by Key Performance Indicators (MOAVI), is able to isolate and focus investigation, set-up algorithms, increase the monitoring period and guarantee better prediction of perceptual quality. MOAVI artefacts Key Performance Indicators (KPI) are classified into four categories, based on their origin: capturing, processing, transmission, and display. In the paper, we present experiments carried out over several steps with four experimental set-ups for concept verification. The methodology takes into the account annoyance visibility threshold. The experimental methodology is adapted from International Telecommunication Union -Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T)The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Regional Development Fund

show abstract

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other KPIs mentioned in MOAVI are usually not taken into account (exposure time distortion, noise, block loss, freezing, slicing, etc.) in predicting MOS [17].…”

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: State-of-the-art Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations