Key Influencers in Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Country-Based Social Network Analysis

Abstract

This article presents a study of Twitter-based communication in order to identify key influencers and to assess the role of their communication in shaping country images. The analysis is based on a 2-month dataset comprised of all tweets including hashtags of the three countries selected for this study: Austria, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. Following a two-step flow model of communication, we initially identified the influential Twitter users in all three countries based on their centrality measures. Subsequently, we carried out a qualitative content analysis of tweets posted by these influential users. Finally, we assessed the similarities and differences across the three country cases. This article offers new insights into public diplomacy 2.0 activities by discussing influence within the context of country images and demonstrating how opinion leaders can play a more dominant role than states or other political actors in creating and disseminating content related to country image. The findings also provide practical insights in the production of a country’s image and its representation on new media platforms.

Understanding China's “intermestic” online vaccination-themed narrative strategy

“…Second, information sharing on social media sites reflects a "dynamic perspective" of information production (Henneberg 2002: 95) as user generated (Ingenhoff, Calamai and Sevin 2021): "in a given series of communication exchanges, any third (or later) transmission (or message) is related to the degree to which previous exchanges referred to even earlier transmissions" (Rafaeli 1988: 14). Third, social media communication and interaction follow the "holistic communication engagement" model (Zaharna 2018: 320).…”

An intermestic approach to China's public diplomacy: a case study of Beijing's COVID-19 communication in the early stages

“…That is to say, the platform attributes and functions of social media (e.g. liking, reposting and sharing) promote the formation of a communication network featuring multiple interactions generated by different actors who participate in meaning construction while enhancing their interdependence (Arsenault, 2014; Ingenhoff et al , 2021; Zaharna, 2007). Scholars in strategic communication and public relations interested in social media have also shown that the online interaction of communication actors can “promote the formation of more favorable public attitudes” (Huang and Wang, 2019a, b, p. 2986) and strengthen persuasion (Duncombe, 2019).…”

La « diplomatie publique digitale » des États-Unis, nouvel art de gouvernement des publics étrangers en ligne

“…Cette préconisation s'appuie sur le constat d'un changement de grande ampleur à l'origine d'une érosion du pouvoir d'influence des États : l'apparition d'usagers générateurs de contenus dans les arènes publiques digitales transnationales. Avec ces derniers, les acteurs institutionnels n'auraient plus de monopole dans le domaine des communications diplomatiques, auraient perdu leur position hiérarchique exclusive de gatekeepers et de producteurs d'informations diplomatiques (Ingenhoff et al, 2021 ;Pamment, 2013). Organisation non gouvernementales (ONG), blogueurs, activistes, groupes terroristes, journalistes citoyens, etc., en livrant en ligne leurs interprétations du sens des événements du monde, ou en diffusant des documents fuités (« leaks »), auraient redistribué la concurrence entre producteurs d'information (Manor, 2016) et, de la sorte, auraient contribué à éroder le pouvoir des États au profit d'autres acteurs (Copeland, 2013).…”