2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key lessons from the COVID-19 public health response in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that New Zealand was able to mount a success response because of strong leadership coordinating with many institutions to implement response measures in real-time, prioritisation of vulnerable populations in responses, effective communication strategies that induced population-wide support of responses and swift institutional approval of pandemic tools 80 81. Responses in Australia82 and Iceland83 also benefited from similarly strong, rapid and coordinated responses. While the USA has a multitude of pandemic capacities, the US response was fragmented due to states implementing different control strategies,84 early institutional rules preventing rapid mobilisation of diagnostic equipment85 and mixed communication that potentially harmed compliance in response measures 86…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that New Zealand was able to mount a success response because of strong leadership coordinating with many institutions to implement response measures in real-time, prioritisation of vulnerable populations in responses, effective communication strategies that induced population-wide support of responses and swift institutional approval of pandemic tools 80 81. Responses in Australia82 and Iceland83 also benefited from similarly strong, rapid and coordinated responses. While the USA has a multitude of pandemic capacities, the US response was fragmented due to states implementing different control strategies,84 early institutional rules preventing rapid mobilisation of diagnostic equipment85 and mixed communication that potentially harmed compliance in response measures 86…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reflecting on what needs to be learnt from the pandemic response in Australia, colleagues and I nominated comprehensive and transparent data collection, reporting, and communication as our top recommendations 5. We are not there yet and will struggle as long as essential public health data aren’t routinely collected and released.…”
Section: An Uphill Battlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease surveillance, including AMR, is mostly based on reports submitted by clinical or laboratory outlets (Gibbons et al, 2014). Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of a broad but accurate surveillance of communicable diseases (Assefa et al, 2022; Basseal et al, 2022). Detection and monitoring of virulence factors can be particularly useful in understanding public health risks of potential infections as virulence factors are often associated with the ability of bacteria or virus to adhere, colonize, invade and sequester nutrients from hosts (Sharma et al, 2017) and increase their pathogenicity (Miller et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%