Key recommendations to strengthen public-private partnership for adolescent health in resource constrained settings: Formative qualitative inquiry in Mongolia, Myanmar and the Philippines

Abstract

Background Public health services can be inaccessible for adolescents. The private sector provides many services, but often in parallel to the public sector. This study aimed to understand current private sector engagement in adolescent health service delivery and develop recommendations to strengthen partnerships. Methods The study focussed on Mongolia, Myanmar and the Philippines. An initial participatory workshop in each country was followed by semi-structured key-informant interviews (32 in total) with public and private sector actors and adolescents to explore: perceptions of the public and private sectors, strengths and challenges, existing models of partnership, and insights for successful public-private partnership (PPP). Interview transcripts were analysed thematically, with findings and recommendations verified through a second workshop in Mongolia and the Philippines. Findings The private sector already plays a significant role in adolescent health care, and stakeholders reported a genuine willingness for partnership. Strengthened PPP was identified as necessary to improve service accessibility and quality for adolescents, unburden the public sector and introduce new technologies, with advantages for the private sector including improved access to training and resources, and an enhanced public image. Recommendations for strengthened PPP included the need to establish the foundations for partnership, clearly define roles and co-ordinate stakeholders, ensure capacity and sustainability, and monitor and evaluate efforts. Interpretation This is the first comprehensive study of public-private partnership for adolescent health in the Asia Pacific region. It identifies stakeholders are willing for stronger partnerships and the benefits this partnership will bring. We define eight key recommendations to enable this partnership across sectors.

Oral health providers’ views of oral health promotion in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study

“…Collaboration between public and private organizations should be established to improve OHP and increase awareness of good oral hygiene among the population [ 36 ]. Public-private partnerships can enhance the impact of outreach programs by addressing social, educational, and clinical aspects, and can also reduce the burden on public organizations, facilitate the adoption of new technologies, improve public perceptions of OHP, and provide access to better training programs [ 37 ].…”

Key informant perspectives on delivering adolescent pregnancy-related services in Eastern Visayas

“…The responses of the informants also corroborate with program evaluation mentioning the decreased effectiveness of RH activities due to underfunding with the resources only planned for a short-term basis, and the fragmentation of service delivery by different agencies (Ulep et al 2021). The informants also verbalized the need for linkages with other agencies in implementing the RH programs which other Philippine-based studies have also noted these constraints in the public health systems, and even recommended utilizing multi-sectoral models, including public-private partnerships, to strengthen and consistently deliver these services for adolescents (Azzopardi et al 2021).…”

Concertación de capital público y privado como política fiscal para la solución de los problemas de ineficiencia dinámica

“…En este contexto, los políticos pueden buscar la concertación de capital público y privado, al prometer la provisión de bienes públicos específicos que satisfagan los intereses de diferentes grupos, incluyendo aquellos con poder económico. La concertación de capital público y privado implica la colaboración y coordinación entre actores del sector público y privado, para abordar los problemas y necesidades de la sociedad diversa (Azzopardi et al, 2021). Sin embargo, también es importante tener mecanismos efectivos para evitar la captura de políticas por parte de grupos poderosos y garantizar que las decisiones se tomen en beneficio del bienestar general y del interés público (Cruz et al, 2020).…”