Key Stakeholder Perspectives of Community Engagement Efforts and the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionally affected historically marginalized populations and their access to resources and healthcare. In times of crisis, authentic community engagement is more important than ever. This study was Phase 1 of a larger 3-phase study to conduct timely community-engaged research with community members to understand the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on historically underserved communities. The objective of this work was to conduct key informant (KI) interviews (1) to understand community organizations perspectives about the role that large academic health centers play as they interface with community organizations to support their work, (2) to leverage KI’s expertise to identify needs and assets within the community, and (3) to inform both Phase 2 (focus group qualitative research) and Phase 3 (survey) of the broader study. Methods: A total of 24 key informants were identified through purposeful sampling and one-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted across 4 states using video conferencing. Results: Barriers to access and lack of transparency were highlighted as major issues requiring reform—in particular, aggressive billing practices and insurance barriers exacerbated local distrust of medical institutions. KIs recognized the health institution’s support for testing and vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, but noted other significant gaps in care, especially regarding mental health support. Although communication with the health institution was consistent for some KIs, others experienced unsustained communication efforts that hindered cooperation and relationship building. Conclusions: Leaders in the community as key stakeholders can provide unique insights into the challenges and potential solutions required to promote health equity, and foster understanding between local communities and healthcare institutions.

Nigerians' outlook on pandemic preparedness – gaps and mitigations

“…Lack of con dence in the government's ability to contain disease outbreaks create trust gap, hence self-help and hiding information from government about early outbreaks will become rampant. Addressing these perception challenges demands proactive engagement and advocacy with stakeholders to foster trust, transparency, and accountability in pandemic response strategies [43,44].…”

Perceptions and Use of Telehealth Among Diverse Communities: Multisite Community-Engaged Mixed Methods Study

“…The study employed quantitative and qualitative methods in three phases. Phase 1 involved qualitative key informant interviews, phase 2 involved focus groups (FGs), and phase 3 employed an anonymous online survey [ 42 ]. As stated by Kelle et al [ 43 ], mixed methods research can support “mutual validation of data” as well as provide a “more coherent and complete” picture than a single research strategy alone.…”