2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.685935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Technologies for Progressing Discovery of Microbiome-Based Medicines

Abstract: A growing number of experimental and computational approaches are illuminating the “microbial dark matter” and uncovering the integral role of commensal microbes in human health. Through this work, it is now clear that the human microbiome presents great potential as a therapeutic target for a plethora of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes and obesity. The development of more efficacious and targeted treatments relies on identification of causal links between the microbiome and disease; w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 190 publications
(209 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the methodology used in these studies, different sequencing technologies, namely 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomic sequencing, have been used to analyze the possible alterations in the nasopharyngeal microbiota of SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects, as well as the potential correlations between such microbiota and the severity of the COVID-19 disease (Table S1). The advantages and disadvantages of both technologies are already well-known: in summary, while 16S rRNA profiling has higher sensitivity but lower taxonomic resolution and the need to assume PCR amplification bias, metagenomic sequencing presents higher taxonomic resolution and incorporates functional information without the need of extrapolation [ 76 ]. Although the 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach to study the microbiota could introduce bias in the obtained data because this method does not allow the study of the whole microbiome, but only the genera amplified by PCR, it is the most commonly used technique to study microbiota in clinical samples.…”
Section: Changes In the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Of Sars-cov-2-infec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the methodology used in these studies, different sequencing technologies, namely 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomic sequencing, have been used to analyze the possible alterations in the nasopharyngeal microbiota of SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects, as well as the potential correlations between such microbiota and the severity of the COVID-19 disease (Table S1). The advantages and disadvantages of both technologies are already well-known: in summary, while 16S rRNA profiling has higher sensitivity but lower taxonomic resolution and the need to assume PCR amplification bias, metagenomic sequencing presents higher taxonomic resolution and incorporates functional information without the need of extrapolation [ 76 ]. Although the 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach to study the microbiota could introduce bias in the obtained data because this method does not allow the study of the whole microbiome, but only the genera amplified by PCR, it is the most commonly used technique to study microbiota in clinical samples.…”
Section: Changes In the Nasopharyngeal Microbiota Of Sars-cov-2-infec...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological advances in sequencing and multi-omics have enhanced our understanding of the microbiome. Specifically, represented by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing, culture-independent methods are widely used for microbiome research nowadays ( Arnold et al, 2016 ; Young et al, 2021 ). These methods enable more accurate profiling of the microbiome composition and structure, because the unculturable microbial majority is also accounted during the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gut microbiome shows a marked individuality, and our understanding of the factors that imbalance gut microbial communities leading to pathogenic processes, has improved thanks to technological improvement and enhanced analysis capabilities (Young et al, 2021). Microbiome studies make an essential contribution and create intervention opportunities that will allow the development of personalised medicine in veterinary and human medicine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%