Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractThe two main objectives of using a hydraulic fracture model in coals are: (a) optimization of job design and placement, and (b) post-fracture diagnostics. Though certain limitations still exist, hydraulic fracture modeling in coals has undergone major advancements in the past decade. Pseudo or lumped three-dimensional (3-D) models have usually been employed to try and meet the objectives mentioned above. The effectiveness of using such models in coals has been very limited. Fully functional 3-D models are currently available in the industry and can be used to obtain better estimates of the fracture dimensions. This paper shows that a grid-oriented fully functional 3-D fracture simulator with shear decoupling can be especially useful in coals for post-fracture diagnostics if sufficient input data can be fixed from logs and Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT).When problems occurred with placement of fracture treatments, especially in the upper Fruitland coals of a San Juan basin project, instead of experimenting with various ideas arbitrarily, technical evaluation using DFIT data and fracture modeling with a grid-oriented, fully functional 3-D fracture simulator, was used to pin-point the issues and address them accordingly. This paper will discuss the deficiencies of using 2-D and pseudo-3-D fracture models in coals and also will discuss the lessons learned from using a grid-oriented, fully functional 3-D fracture simulator in this project along with the successful implementation of the results developed from the modeling work. Literature ReviewOver the last 25 years, numerous papers have been published regarding hydraulic fracturing and modeling in coals. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] et al. 1 investigated how well the fractures are contained in coal during a stimulation treatment. In this study, 12 vertical wells were drilled, completed, and subsequently evaluated via mining excavation. The treatment designs were adjusted using the information gathered from excavation. Layne, et al. 2 through their U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) work wanted to advance the hydraulic fracturing techniques in coals by improving the understanding of fracturing treatments using mineback observations. They used five fracture models that were developed under contract to the DOE to analyze the mineback observations. Jones, et al. 3 evaluated 130 fracturing treatments in their study. They observed high treating pressures during fracture treatments in Black Warrior basin and attributed the following as possible causes: (a) high pore pressure buildup due to fluid leakoff, (b) multiple fracture propagation, and (c) fracture-tip plugging by coal fines. They modified a pseudo-3-D model to replicate a fracture tipscreenout caused by coalfines plugging within the pad. Jones, et al. 4 presented another paper addressing the unusual treating pressures observed during hydraulic fracture treatments in coal. As part of that work, they presented methodologies to design fractur...
fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractThe two main objectives of using a hydraulic fracture model in coals are: (a) optimization of job design and placement, and (b) post-fracture diagnostics. Though certain limitations still exist, hydraulic fracture modeling in coals has undergone major advancements in the past decade. Pseudo or lumped three-dimensional (3-D) models have usually been employed to try and meet the objectives mentioned above. The effectiveness of using such models in coals has been very limited. Fully functional 3-D models are currently available in the industry and can be used to obtain better estimates of the fracture dimensions. This paper shows that a grid-oriented fully functional 3-D fracture simulator with shear decoupling can be especially useful in coals for post-fracture diagnostics if sufficient input data can be fixed from logs and Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT).When problems occurred with placement of fracture treatments, especially in the upper Fruitland coals of a San Juan basin project, instead of experimenting with various ideas arbitrarily, technical evaluation using DFIT data and fracture modeling with a grid-oriented, fully functional 3-D fracture simulator, was used to pin-point the issues and address them accordingly. This paper will discuss the deficiencies of using 2-D and pseudo-3-D fracture models in coals and also will discuss the lessons learned from using a grid-oriented, fully functional 3-D fracture simulator in this project along with the successful implementation of the results developed from the modeling work. Literature ReviewOver the last 25 years, numerous papers have been published regarding hydraulic fracturing and modeling in coals. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] et al. 1 investigated how well the fractures are contained in coal during a stimulation treatment. In this study, 12 vertical wells were drilled, completed, and subsequently evaluated via mining excavation. The treatment designs were adjusted using the information gathered from excavation. Layne, et al. 2 through their U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) work wanted to advance the hydraulic fracturing techniques in coals by improving the understanding of fracturing treatments using mineback observations. They used five fracture models that were developed under contract to the DOE to analyze the mineback observations. Jones, et al. 3 evaluated 130 fracturing treatments in their study. They observed high treating pressures during fracture treatments in Black Warrior basin and attributed the following as possible causes: (a) high pore pressure buildup due to fluid leakoff, (b) multiple fracture propagation, and (c) fracture-tip plugging by coal fines. They modified a pseudo-3-D model to replicate a fracture tipscreenout caused by coalfines plugging within the pad. Jones, et al. 4 presented another paper addressing the unusual treating pressures observed during hydraulic fracture treatments in coal. As part of that work, they presented methodologies to design fractur...
Hydraulic fracturing has been a key technology in the development of coalbed methane (CBM) resources worldwide. Obtaining adequate fracture length and conductivity has limited the ability to obtain adequate productivity improvement to further develop many small seams or stacked-seam reservoirs. Fracture complexity and growth out of the interval have frequently been cited as limiting factors in achieving optimal length in these types of intervals; however, the diagnostics to evaluate and model these effects have been limited. Finally, many of the past studies of hydraulic fracturing mechanics in coal have been focused on North American examples where normal faulting stress states are present, unlike many of the coal-producing basins worldwide and particularly in Eastern Australia. Using examples from the Scotia Field, we describe how past and present stress framework analyses and post-frac treatment diagnostics were integrated to better describe the in-situ stress state. Through analyses of these examples, we qualify the inter-relationships of productivity to in-situ stress, pre-existing fractures, and observations from the induced hydraulic fractures. Finally, we describe cases where the hydraulic fracturing complexity and in-situ stress conditions lead to wellbore complications and observable rock-mechanical failures. The end result is a more predictive model, which is being used to develop this CBM resource. Introduction Initially, most CBM projects focus on identifying contiguous coal sections with sufficient gas in place to support commercial production. Most often, basic geologic mapping and coal quality information are used to delineate and high-grade prospective areas. Ultimately, the reserves potential of these areas must be proven by direct measurement of key reservoir properties and production testing. Experience from analyses of coalbed methane projects worldwide indicate the more important reservoir parameters controlling gas productivity include:permeability (fracture/cleat system),gas content,well spacing,initial gas and water saturation in the fracture/cleat system, andthe relationship between reservoir pressure and flowing well pressure.1 Of these, permeability is the most important since it controls the flow rate of gas and water and can be affected by in-situ stress.In CBM projects in-situ stress can also affect the benefit derived from reservoir stimulation; often the well productivity and economics of a project can become highly dependent on the degree of stimulation effectiveness.2 Inter-relationship of Permeability to Stress. Since coals are a complex, fractured, dual-porosity system, a bulk permeability value is used to describe the system of low-permeability organic matrix components surrounded by cleats or natural fractures.3Because of the inherent variability in permeability and productivity, CBM exploration and development projects tend to be statistical plays, where large multi-well projects are used to explore and develop an area of reservoir.Ultimately, the average well productivity and the required well spacing to maximize gas recovery will govern the overall economics of the project. In many areas, proper characterization of the in-situ stress regime has played a pivotal role in the successful commercialization of CBM. Firstly, the aperture of fractures and cleats and hence their contribution to permeability tends to be extremely stress-sensitive.Sparks et al., identified how the permeability of fractures and cleats vary as a log function of in-situ stress (Fig. 1).4 Thus, low mean stress regimes support open and more conductive natural fractures. Inter-relationship of Permeability to Stress. Since coals are a complex, fractured, dual-porosity system, a bulk permeability value is used to describe the system of low-permeability organic matrix components surrounded by cleats or natural fractures.3Because of the inherent variability in permeability and productivity, CBM exploration and development projects tend to be statistical plays, where large multi-well projects are used to explore and develop an area of reservoir.Ultimately, the average well productivity and the required well spacing to maximize gas recovery will govern the overall economics of the project. In many areas, proper characterization of the in-situ stress regime has played a pivotal role in the successful commercialization of CBM. Firstly, the aperture of fractures and cleats and hence their contribution to permeability tends to be extremely stress-sensitive.Sparks et al., identified how the permeability of fractures and cleats vary as a log function of in-situ stress (Fig. 1).4 Thus, low mean stress regimes support open and more conductive natural fractures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.