2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ki-67 and ProExC are useful immunohistochemical markers in esophageal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al . showed that Ki67 and ProExC exhibited high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing reactive hyperplasia from LGIN and HGIN [50]. In this study, we found that c-Jun, cystatin A, involucrin and SPRR3 expressed exclusively in the basal layer, are detected in all epidermal layers, but low in LGIN and HGIN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Wang et al . showed that Ki67 and ProExC exhibited high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing reactive hyperplasia from LGIN and HGIN [50]. In this study, we found that c-Jun, cystatin A, involucrin and SPRR3 expressed exclusively in the basal layer, are detected in all epidermal layers, but low in LGIN and HGIN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Compared with other quantification methods, such as calculating percentage of immunoreactive cells [27], advantages of the method are speed, ease, and reproducibility. ProExC expression as a cell-proliferation marker was reported to show a similar pattern to that of Ki-67 in LIN, HIN, and CIS [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Thus, the up-regulation of CK14 in an early phase of esophageal carcinogenesis may be associated with increased cell proliferation, failure of terminal differentiation, and oncogenic aberration. We adopted a quantification method for Ki-67 positivity in esophageal SIN focusing on height of staining within the squamous epithelium, in accordance with a recent study [31], with some modification. Compared with other quantification methods, such as calculating percentage of immunoreactive cells [27], advantages of the method are speed, ease, and reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Intermediate and strong Ki-67 staining is highly sensitive and specific in distinguishing reactive or hyperplastic squamous epithelium from squamous IN. Immunohistochemistry of p53 protein expression showed high specificity but low sensitivity in distinguishing reactive hyperplasia from squamous IN.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosis and Pitfalls With Respect To Squamous Inmentioning
confidence: 99%