1982
DOI: 10.1159/000212561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney Ageing and Renal Excretion of Amylase

Abstract: In a cross-sectional study, the amylase to creatinine clearance ratio (ACCR) was determined in 180 patients, age range 18–93 years. An inverse correlation was found between ACCR and creatinine clearance (r = ––0.40, p < 0.001) in keeping with the known inverse relationship between the sieving fraction of macromolecules and the glomerular filtration rate. The fractional clearance of amylase was not significantly affected by amylasemia nor by age when the creatinine clearance was also considered in a multiple re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The enhancement of the amylase to creatinine clearance ratio found in the elderly may mainly reflect modifications in glomerular filtration dynamics. 7 The single most important physiologic abnormality in the aging kidney is the decline in glomerular filtration rate. s However, why levels of both P-and S-type isoamylases are higher in women in the third and fourth decade than they are in men, and why isoamylase levels tend to be increased in younger age groups, is still obscure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The enhancement of the amylase to creatinine clearance ratio found in the elderly may mainly reflect modifications in glomerular filtration dynamics. 7 The single most important physiologic abnormality in the aging kidney is the decline in glomerular filtration rate. s However, why levels of both P-and S-type isoamylases are higher in women in the third and fourth decade than they are in men, and why isoamylase levels tend to be increased in younger age groups, is still obscure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%