2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney Dimensions at Sonography are Correlated With Glomerular Filtration Rate in Renal Transplant Recipients and in Kidney Donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Renal length was chosen as the dependent variable from other ultrasongraphic measurements such as renal volume and cortical thickness because renal length has the least amount of inter-observer variation and has been established to correlate with GFR. 24,34 Compared to published healthy controls, most age groups in the MMA cohort had significantly smaller renal lengths (Table 1). The healthy control group and the MMA group both had similar constants (y-intercept), 6.79 and 6.80 respectively, suggesting that kidney size was normal at birth in the MMA patients; however, the slope (cm/year) of kidney length increase in the MMA group was less than half that of the controls: 0.09 cm/year versus 0.22 cm/year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Renal length was chosen as the dependent variable from other ultrasongraphic measurements such as renal volume and cortical thickness because renal length has the least amount of inter-observer variation and has been established to correlate with GFR. 24,34 Compared to published healthy controls, most age groups in the MMA cohort had significantly smaller renal lengths (Table 1). The healthy control group and the MMA group both had similar constants (y-intercept), 6.79 and 6.80 respectively, suggesting that kidney size was normal at birth in the MMA patients; however, the slope (cm/year) of kidney length increase in the MMA group was less than half that of the controls: 0.09 cm/year versus 0.22 cm/year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, total kidney volume, parenchymal renal volume and even length using ultrasound have also been shown to correlate with measured GFR (again assessed only at baseline) among potential living donors, actual donors and recipients [15, 29, 30], although others have not demonstrated a significant relationship between kidney volume and baseline eGFR [31]. Most studies did not examine the relationship of kidney size and kidney function over time (post-operatively or longer-term), and they did not adjust kidney size for patient size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transplant donor's size (length, weight or volume) is often cited as a predictive factor for recipient allograft function [1517] but likely also predicts donor outcomes including donor kidney function [18]. Recent publications seem to favor total kidney volume [16] or cortical volume [19] in living donor transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kidney volume is important for staging of renovascular hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency and transplantation [3,80]. Even more length has been weakly yet constantly and directly correlated with creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate in transplanted patients, making it an appropriate examination for follow-up of patients with known renal insufficiency [7,71,97,101]. Viscera width and thickness do not present direct clinical importance, yet they are necessary for calculating spleen [68,103] and kidney [23] volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%