Kidney stones among Iranian adults: Prevalence and socioeconomic inequality assessment in a cohort‐based cross‐sectional study

Abstract

Background and Aims Kidney stone disease is a crystal concretion formed usually within the kidneys. The worldwide prevalence of kidney stones could be affected by numerous differences in socioeconomic, and environmental factors. The purpose of this study is to investigate kidney stones among Iranian adults aged between 35 and 70 years and the prevalence and evaluation of socioeconomic inequalities. Methods In this, a cohort‐based cross‐sectional study was carried out among 20,427 participants of ArNCDs aged 35 and 70 years old. Kidney stone was defined as a dependent (and binary) variable while demographic and socioeconomic factors were considered independent variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the key socioeconomic factors affecting kidney stone prevalence in Ardabil. Results The overall prevalence of kidney stones was 17.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.1–19.2) out of which 21.53% and 14.36% pertained to men and women and 14.18% and 23.17% pertained to the poorest and richest groups, respectively. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of kidney stones between men and women in terms of age, marital status, education level, chronic disease, body mass index, and socioeconomic status (<0.001). The prevalence of kidney stones had a positive correlation with age (1.7, 95% [CI]: 1.42–2.04) and socioeconomic status (1.5, 95% [CI]: 1.34–1.69), where the odds of kidney stones increased significantly by increasing age and socioeconomic status. Moreover, the kidney stone concentration index showed a pro‐rich distribution wherein it was more common among wealthy people (higher socioeconomic status) 0.062 (95% [CI]: 0.051–0.072). Conclusion The results of this study showed that there is significant inequality in the prevalence of kidney stones, where it was more common among the richest people. In addition, being men and old age are significantly related to kidney stones, so policymakers and physicians should consider these factors.

Exploring the Impact of Family History, Demographics and Ecological Factors on Urolithiasis Prevalence: Insights from a Nationwide Study

“…Previously, multiple studies have shown that older age is associated with a significantly higher probability of having had at least one episode of urolithiasis in the past. 16 , 17 Our analyses revealed a consistent finding, demonstrating an OR [95% CI] of 1.04 [1.04, 1.04] in multivariable analysis. This finding means that with every 1 year increase in age, the odds of urolithiasis increased by 4%.…”

Prevalence and associated factors for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults in the PERSIAN Guilan cohort study (PGCS)

“…An observational study among Canadian men found no significant difference between the risk of AMH in different BMI groups 4 . In addition, a recent study among Iranian adults showed that underweight participants are at a greater risk of being diagnosed with nephrolithiasis 36 . Previous studies showed that obesity could advance prostate tissue inflammation 37 and increase the risk of cystitis and urothelial dysplasia, which in turn may cause AMH 1 .…”

Socioeconomic and environmental factors associated with waterpipe tobacco smoking among Iranian adults: a PERSIAN cohort-based cross-sectional study

“…The PERSIAN cohort study's extensive protocol aimed to recruit participants for this study, resulting in 20,525 men and women aged 18 years and above residing in Ardabil, who participated in the baseline survey between May 2017 and February 2020. As defined in study protocol [ 26 , 27 ], the alluded age range was chosen for three reasons to be eligible in participating PERSIAN cohort: i) individuals in this age group are more likely to have well-established behaviors and lifestyles, 2) they are active and energetic enough to participate in a study; and iii) they will, within a reasonable amount of time, incur the PERSIAN study’s primary outcomes of interest (ie. a number of deaths, by cause and incidence of major NCDs) (see Poustchi et al 2017 [ 26 ] for more details).…”