2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0759-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Killing of CLL and NHL cells by rituximab and ofatumumab under limited availability of complement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ofatumumab (originally designed as 2F2) was first reported in 2004 as a fully human anti-CD20 antibody, which outperformed rituximab in CDC activation [ 14 ]. These results were later confirmed by Beurskens et al, who tested both antibodies within a wide range of tumour cell load and serum concentration [ 10 ] and also by our studies, in which in vitro susceptibility to CDC under limited availability of complement of eighteen CD20 + cell lines and fresh CLL cultures was assessed [ 15 ]. We found that ratio of the target (CD20) to complement inhibitor CD55 distinguished cells highly sensitive to both anti-CD20 mAbs from those of moderate sensitivity, which were killed more efficiently by ofatumumab.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ofatumumab (originally designed as 2F2) was first reported in 2004 as a fully human anti-CD20 antibody, which outperformed rituximab in CDC activation [ 14 ]. These results were later confirmed by Beurskens et al, who tested both antibodies within a wide range of tumour cell load and serum concentration [ 10 ] and also by our studies, in which in vitro susceptibility to CDC under limited availability of complement of eighteen CD20 + cell lines and fresh CLL cultures was assessed [ 15 ]. We found that ratio of the target (CD20) to complement inhibitor CD55 distinguished cells highly sensitive to both anti-CD20 mAbs from those of moderate sensitivity, which were killed more efficiently by ofatumumab.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To confirm that alternative complement pathway is relevant to the amplification of anti-CD20 mAb-mediated complement activation, we performed CDC assay in serum with or without FB. Previously, we found Daudi cells to be highly sensitive to ofatumumab at low serum concentrations [ 15 ] and now we tested the same cells at two different, suboptimal concentrations of ofatumumab to better visualize the importance of alternative pathway. In parallel with increasing serum concentration, there was a trend towards higher CDC in FB-reconstituted serum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus according to our ELISAs, there was not a single case of decrease in C4d, sC5b-6 or sC5b-9 after anti-CD20 treatment. As an explanation for increase of sC5b-9 in only 56% of the patients presenting increase of C4d, we propose the effect of membrane bound complement inhibitors expressed on the surface of tumor cells, which mainly target the level of complement convertases engaged in transition from opsonic to lytic stage (Manches et al, 2003;Okroj et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Measurement Of Soluble Markers Of Complement Activation In Pmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Upon binding to target cell, anti-CD20 mAbs are expected to activate the classical complement pathway but it is not clear, which effector arm of the complement system contribute to the therapeutic effect (Okroj et al, 2013b). Also, it is not always the case that complement attack on tumor cells will proceed to the lytic stage, as malignant B cells may shed CD20-mAb complexes (Taylor and Lindorfer, 2014) and widely express the complement inhibitors CD46 and CD55 preventing C5 cleavage (Okroj et al, 2013a). Two samples were taken from each patient: one just before and the second immediately after CD20 mAb infusion.…”
Section: Measurement Of Soluble Markers Of Complement Activation In Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ofatumumab induces greater cell lysis than rituximab through increased CDC activity, primarily through greater activation of the classical complement pathway [31,32]. When compared with rituximab, the CDC activity of ofatumumab is augmented by the drug's ability to more efficiently utilize available complement; a nontrivial finding when taking into account the often low complement availability within the blood of CLL patients [33]. Ofatumumab is also able to induce similar ADCC as that seen with rituximab but more potent antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and greater direct cell killing than rituximab in CLL cells [26].…”
Section: Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%