2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.02717
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kilonova Emission From Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers. II. Luminosity Function and Implications for Target-of-opportunity Observations of Gravitational-wave Triggers and Blind Searches

Jin-Ping Zhu,
Shichao Wu,
Yuan-Pei Yang
et al.

Abstract: We present detailed simulations of kilonova and GRB afterglow emission originating from black holeneutron star (BH-NS) mergers. We present kilonova luminosity function and discuss the detectability of kilonova and GRB afterglow in connection with gravitational wave (GW) detections, GW-triggered target-of-opportunity follow-up observations, and blind searches in time-domain survey observations. The predicted absolute magnitude of the radioactive-powered BH-NS merger kilonovae at 0.5 day after the merger falls i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 236 publications
(343 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the predicted brightness for most of kilonovae still be too faint for the follow-up observations of LSST. This result is basically consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Zappa et al 2019;Zhu et al 2020b;Drozda et al 2020). For future GW-triggered multi-messenger observations, one may search for potential sGRB and afterglow as ideal EM counterparts of NSBH GW events.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the predicted brightness for most of kilonovae still be too faint for the follow-up observations of LSST. This result is basically consistent with other recent studies (e.g., Zappa et al 2019;Zhu et al 2020b;Drozda et al 2020). For future GW-triggered multi-messenger observations, one may search for potential sGRB and afterglow as ideal EM counterparts of NSBH GW events.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, in spite of many efforts for follow-up observations, no confirmed EM counterpart candidate was identified 1 (e.g., Anand et al 2020;Andreoni et al 2020;Coughlin et al 2020a;Gompertz et al 2020;Page et al 2020;Kasliwal et al 2020;Sagués Carracedo et al 2020). One plausible explanation for the lack of detection of an EM counterpart is that present EM searches are too shallow to achieve distance and volumetric coverage for the probability maps of LVC events (Coughlin et al 2020b;Sagués Carracedo et al 2020;Zhu et al 2020b). However, it is also possible and even likely that the EM counterparts are intrinsically missing, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection of BH-NS mergers is of great interest as they are expected to emit across a broad electromagnetic spectrum and have been suggested to produce radio flares (Nakar & Piran 2011;Hotokezaka et al 2016), kilonovae (Li & Paczyński 1998;Zhu et al 2020), short gamma-ray bursts (Paczynski 1986;Gompertz et al 2020), and so on. A recent quite comprehensive study of BH-NS mergers can be found in Broekgaarden et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the near-infrared emission is expected to be isotropic, longlived (>1 week), and ubiquitous in models regardless of mass ratio, viewing angle, or remnant lifetime (Kasen et al 2017). Models predict the detection rates of kilonovae in the near-infrared could be up to ∼ 8 − 10 times higher than in optical wavebands (Zhu et al 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%