Kinder und Jugendliche in Deutschland: Gewalterfahrungen, Integration, Medienkonsum. Zweiter Bericht zum gemeinsamen Forschungsprojekt des Bundesministeriums des Innern und des KFN

Baier, Dirk; Pfeiffer, Christian; Rabold, Susann; Simonson, Julia; Kappes, Cathleen

doi:10.15496/publikation-27316

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Twenty documents were excluded because they did not meet the definition of radicalization required in this systematic review. Among them, radicalization was defined, for example, in terms of feeling Spanish, Catalan or both (Rico & Jennings, 2016), self-identifying as socialists (Krout & Stagner, 1939), opposition to the established order in capitalist societies (Førland et al, 2010), voting for radical or populist parties (e.g., Coffé & Voorpostel, 2010) or mixing radicalization with other constructs that did not explicitly imply violence such as xenophobia (e.g., Baier et al, 2010;Klein-Allermann et al, 1995) and women's rights (El-Badayneh & ElHasan, 2017). Studies that mixed radicalization with other not explicitly violent behaviors or attitudes were excluded because high scores could be driven by responses to items that did not focus on the use of violence to defend a cause.…”

Section: Description Of Excluded Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family‐related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization

Zych

Nasaescu

2022

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Family‐related risk and protective factors are crucial for different antisocial behaviors, but their role in radicalization requires synthesis. Radicalization is likely to have a negative impact on families, and well‐designed and implemented family‐focused intervention programs have the potential to decrease radicalization. Objectives Research questions were: (1) What are the family‐related risk and protective factors for radicalization? (2) What is the impact of radicalization on families? (3) Are family‐based interventions against radicalization effective? Search Methods Searches included 25 databases and hand searches of gray literature from April to July 2021. Leading researchers in the field were asked to provide published and unpublished studies on the topic. Reference lists of the included studies and previously published systematic reviews on risk and protective factors for radicalization were scanned. Selection Criteria Published and unpublished quantitative studies on family‐related risk and protective factors for radicalization, the impact of radicalization on families, and family‐focused interventions were eligible with no restrictions regarding the study year, location, or any demographic characteristic. Studies were included if they measured the relation between a family‐related factor and radicalization or if they included a family‐focused intervention against radicalization. For family‐related risk and protective factors, radicalized individuals needed to be compared to general population. Studies were included if they defined radicalization as support or commission of violence to defend a cause, including support for radical groups. Data Collection and Analysis The systematic search identified 86,591 studies. After screening, 33 studies focused on family‐related risk and protective factors were included, with 89 primary effect sizes and 48 variables grouped in 14 factors. For the factors that included two or more studies, meta‐analyses with random effects were conducted. When possible, moderator analyses were performed together with sensitivity and publication bias analyses. No studies on the impact of radicalization on families or family‐focused interventions were included. Results The current systematic review based on studies with 148,081 adults and adolescents from diverse geographic locations showed that parental ethnic socialization (z = 0.27), having extremist family members (z = 0.26), and family conflict (z = 0.11) were related to more radicalization, whereas high family socioeconomic status (z = −0.03), bigger family size (z = −0.05), and high family commitment (z = −0.06) were related to less radicalization. Separate analyses described family‐factors for behavioral versus cognitive radicalization, and different radical ideologies including Islamist, right‐wing and left‐wing. It was not possible to distinguish risk and protective factors from correlates and the level of overall bias was mostly high. No results regarding the impact of radicalization on families or fam...

show abstract

Section: Description Of Excluded Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family‐related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization

Zych

Nasaescu

2022

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Polizei in einer multiethnischen Gesellschaft – Herausforderungen und Chancen

El-Khechen,

Walbrühl,

Steinhäuser

2024

Diversität Und Polizei

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interethnische Analysen der Verteilungen psychischer Störungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in einer Inanspruchnahmepopulation

Kouider¹,

Dupont²,

Koglin³

et al. 2014

Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interethnic Analyses of Distributions in Children and Adolescents Mental Disorders in a Health Care Utilization The study examines ethnic differences in mental disorders in a child and adolescent psychiatry population in a major German city from 2007 to 2011 (N = 5,680). Risks of developing specific mental disorders were calculated. African migrant children and adolescents showed higher risk in traumatic stress and adjustment disorders (F 43 in ICD-10), the Asiatic group in dissociative disorders (F 44-45). Compared to other European migrants the German children and adolescents without migration background had a higher risk of affective disorders (F 3). Adolescents (N = 3,556) with Russian and Polish background had a higher risk of disorders induced by psychotropic substances (F 1). Turkish and Arabic adolescents had a 4- to 5-times increasing risk in schizophrenia as well as schizotypal or delusional disorders (F 2). In addition, mental disorders were influenced by gender and nationality. These study results suggest that a different vulnerability to specific mental disorders is associated to ethnicity.

show abstract

Kinder und Jugendliche in Deutschland: Gewalterfahrungen, Integration, Medienkonsum. Zweiter Bericht zum gemeinsamen Forschungsprojekt des Bundesministeriums des Innern und des KFN

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family‐related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization

Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family‐related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization

Polizei in einer multiethnischen Gesellschaft – Herausforderungen und Chancen

Interethnische Analysen der Verteilungen psychischer Störungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in einer Inanspruchnahmepopulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About